Re: FYI: bison-1.875 lets gcc bootstraps fail

2003-01-22 Thread Paul Eggert
From: Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:36:49 +0100 We need %expect 1, 2, since for instance in GLR/BT you are allowed to have rr conflicts. Good point. But in the present case, in the future, we need no additional flag or feature, we simply need the warning to

Re: FYI: bison-1.875 lets gcc bootstraps fail

2003-01-21 Thread Akim Demaille
| From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 08:56:07 +0100 | | objc-parse.y: conflicts: 31 shift/reduce, 1 reduce/reduce | objc-parse.y: expected 0 reduce/reduce conflicts | | Thanks for the bug report. This failure is due to two recent changes | to Bison. The first

Re: FYI: bison-1.875 lets gcc bootstraps fail

2003-01-11 Thread Paul Eggert
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 08:56:07 +0100 objc-parse.y: conflicts: 31 shift/reduce, 1 reduce/reduce objc-parse.y: expected 0 reduce/reduce conflicts Thanks for the bug report. This failure is due to two recent changes to Bison. The first one appeared in