Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 280940 [Fixed in 4.3.0]Â gnat: Legal rejected in gnat 3.15p, RM
> 3.10(15); incorrect execution in gcc 3.4.0
Bug#280940: gnat: Legal rejected in gnat 3.15p, RM 3.10(15); incorrect
execution in gcc 3.4.0
Changed Bug title to [Fixed in 4
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:50:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnat-3.15p: fails to compile polyorb
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 253865 gcc-defaults
Bug#253865: gnat-3.15p: fails to compile polyorb
Bug reassigned from package `gnat-4.1' to `gcc-defaults'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
FYI: The status of the gnat source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 3.15p-19
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more informatio
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:01:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #243066: gcc-3.2: FTBFS with gnat 3.15p-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.3-9
Severity: important
>From my build log of trying to build gcc-3.2 using gnat instead of
gnat-3.2:
...
make[5]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9/build/gcc/ada'
gnatgcc -c -g -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wtra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes:
> Florian, I don't agree. I understand your arguments but honestly,
> there is no more than one ACT release per year. So people don't
> have to often rebuilt their programs and libraries.
I've looked at a few packages which would need DSOs and I came to t
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm going to recompile the existing Ada packages in Debian using GNAT
> 3.15p, at least on x86.
>
> This involves the following steps:
>
> - Packaging GNAT 3.15p (mostly done). I'm going to omit DSO support
>
I'm going to recompile the existing Ada packages in Debian using GNAT
3.15p, at least on x86.
This involves the following steps:
- Packaging GNAT 3.15p (mostly done). I'm going to omit DSO support
(see below).
- Fixing the FTBFS errors of current Ada packages (not necessarily
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes:
>
>> Nonetheless, I suspect that the package won't build on sparc,
>> since 5smastop.adb at least has disappeared in this version.
>> Sam ported GNAT to sparc/linux and powerpc/linux and I have no
>> idea about
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes:
> Nonetheless, I suspect that the package won't build on sparc,
> since 5smastop.adb at least has disappeared in this version.
> Sam ported GNAT to sparc/linux and powerpc/linux and I have no
> idea about how he proceeded.
>
> Are you able to test?
No, th
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes:
>
>>> I'll check soon if I can get GNAT 3.15p to bootstrap on reasonably
>>> current unstable...
>
>> Thanks for taking care of this.
>
> A preliminar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes:
>> I'll check soon if I can get GNAT 3.15p to bootstrap on reasonably
>> current unstable...
> Thanks for taking care of this.
A preliminary 3.15p source package is now available at
<http://www.enyo.de/fw/debian/gnat/> (beware,
fore nobody packaged 3.15 yet.
>
> I believe that it is reasonable (even desirable) to replace 3.14p with
> 3.15p.
>
> My reservations are towards GNAT 5.0 technology, which is not mature
> yet (at least in the version in the FSF tree).
>
> I'll check soon if I can get GNAT
ble) to replace 3.14p with
3.15p.
My reservations are towards GNAT 5.0 technology, which is not mature
yet (at least in the version in the FSF tree).
I'll check soon if I can get GNAT 3.15p to bootstrap on reasonably
current unstable...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> Back from vacation ? :-)
too soon :-) last week planes could'nt start due to a cyclone, but
that didn't delay my return this week ;-)
> > > Is anyone still working on this or should I give it a try
> > > (I'm not th
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
Back from vacation ? :-)
> > Is anyone still working on this or should I give it a try
> > (I'm not the best skilled though)?
>
> Usually Florian keeps an open eye on gnat. AFAICR 3.14 passes an Ada
> validation suite, which 3.15 does not yet pass
=?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me?= Marant writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> GNAT 3.15p has been released last November and it is still
> not packaged in Debian. Since, the GNAT from GCC tree is
> still not stable enough, I'd suggest that we keep on updating
> the ACT public releas
Hi,
GNAT 3.15p has been released last November and it is still
not packaged in Debian. Since, the GNAT from GCC tree is
still not stable enough, I'd suggest that we keep on updating
the ACT public release.
Jon Ward told he was packaging it but nothing seemed to
happen.
Is a
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:36:10AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - where did you see the announcement?
A couple of people brought it to my attention by word of mouth and word
of email. It may have been mentioned on one of the ACT mailing lists,
but since I am not a customer of ACT, I'm not on any
Jon Ward writes:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 08:47:35PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> > This is just a reminder that GNAT 3.15p has been released.
> > I think that it is far more stable that the version from
> > GCC so it would be nice to make it available to Ada coders
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 08:47:35PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> This is just a reminder that GNAT 3.15p has been released.
> I think that it is far more stable that the version from
> GCC so it would be nice to make it available to Ada coders.
> I recall that some people wer
Hi,
This is just a reminder that GNAT 3.15p has been released.
I think that it is far more stable that the version from
GCC so it would be nice to make it available to Ada coders.
I recall that some people were interested in taking it over.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
http
23 matches
Mail list logo
