Your message dated Wed, 17 Jul 2019 12:22:34 +0200
with message-id <20190717102234.GA5691@nicolasthinkpad>
and subject line close 858890
has caused the Debian Bug report #858890,
regarding gnat-6: missing dependency on the gcc package ?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 08:56:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 02.04.2018 19:09, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> > Installing build-essential resulted in g++-7 being installed, which
> > “fixed” the problem, so it looks like there are missing dependencies
> > in whichever package provides cc.
Your message dated Mon, 2 Apr 2018 20:56:09 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#894634: gcc-7: Missing dependency on g++ ?
has caused the Debian Bug report #894634,
regarding gcc-7: Missing dependency on g++ ?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: gcc-7
Version: 7.3.0-14, 7.3.0-12
Severity: important
Hi,
I am unable to compile C++ sources on a fresh Debian install, with
the `cpp` package installed:
> $ cc main.cc
> cc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
Investigating with `strace -e trace=process -
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 gnat-6 6.3.0-10
Bug #858890 [gnat] gnat-6: missing dependency on the gcc package ?
Bug reassigned from package 'gnat' to 'gnat-6'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #858890 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 gnat
Bug #858890 [gnat-6] gnat-6: missing dependency on the gcc package ?
Bug reassigned from package 'gnat-6' to 'gnat'.
No longer marked as found in versions gcc-6/6.3.0-10.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #85
Control: reassign -1 gnat
confirmed. gnat should depend on gcc. However this package is almost always
installed with the build-essential package.
On 28.03.2017 11:22, Adrien Panay wrote:
> Package: gnat-6
> Version: 6.3.0-10
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I encountered this issue o
Package: gnat-6
Version: 6.3.0-10
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I encountered this issue on a newly installed system while performing
basic ada programming, a simple hello world triggers the following
situation.
What led up to the situation?
Installing gnat and trying to compile a simple h
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:32:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#653078: fixed in gdc-4.6 0.29.1-4.6.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #653078,
regarding Missing dependency on libphobos2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: gdc-4.6
Version: 0.29.1-4.6.2-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
Thanks sooo much for finally packaging gdc for D version 2!!
There's a missing dependency on libphobos2-4.6-dev, however. This causes
standard library references like std.compiler to fail to compile.
Manually installing libph
Your message dated Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:39:30 +0100
with message-id
and subject line gnat-4.3 removed from the archive, superseded by gnat-4.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #553237,
regarding libgnatprj4.3: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by
./usr/lib/libgnatprj.so.4.3 but the
Your message dated Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:39:30 +0100
with message-id
and subject line gnat-4.3 removed from the archive, superseded by gnat-4.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #553236,
regarding libgnatvsn4.3: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by
./usr/lib/libgnatvsn.so.4.3 but the
Your message dated
with message-id <20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #553159,
regarding gappletviewer-4.3: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by
./usr/bin/gappletview
;>> Justification: The listed file appears to be linked against the C library,
>>>> User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
>>>> Usertags: missing-dependency-on-libc
>>>
>>> The library depends on libgnat-4.3 which depends on libc6, so the
>>> depende
he C library,
>>> User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
>>> Usertags: missing-dependency-on-libc
>>
>> The library depends on libgnat-4.3 which depends on libc6, so the
>> dependency on libc6 is there, albeit indirectly. Is this really a
>> policy violation?
>
>
Manoj Srivastava writes:
> Package: libgnatvsn4.3
> Version: 4.3.4-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: The listed file appears to be linked against the C library,
> User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
> Usertags: missing-dependency-on-libc
The library depends on libgnat-4.3 whic
Package: libgnatprj4.3
Version: 4.3.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: The listed file appears to be linked against the C library,
User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: missing-dependency-on-libc
All shared libraries and compiled binaries must be run through dpkg-shlibdeps to
find out any
Package: libgnatvsn4.3
Version: 4.3.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: The listed file appears to be linked against the C library,
User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: missing-dependency-on-libc
All shared libraries and compiled binaries must be run through dpkg-shlibdeps to
find out any
Package: lib64stdc++6-4.2-dbg
Version: 4.2.4-6
Severity: serious
Justification: The listed file appears to be linked against the C library,
User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: missing-dependency-on-libc
All shared libraries and compiled binaries must be run through dpkg-shlibdeps to
find out
Package: gappletviewer-4.3
Version: 4.3.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: The listed file appears to be linked against the C library,
User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: missing-dependency-on-libc
All shared libraries and compiled binaries must be run through dpkg-shlibdeps to
find out
Your message dated Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:30:14 +0100
with message-id <18760.40054.246527.294...@gargle.gargle.howl>
and subject line Re: gcc-snapshot: missing dependency
has caused the Debian Bug report #454667,
regarding gcc-snapshot: missing dependency
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:15:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gcc-snapshot 20080224-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #454976,
regarding gcc-snapshot: missing dependency
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:15:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gcc-snapshot 20080224-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #454667,
regarding gcc-snapshot: missing dependency
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
OTECTED]>
Subject: java-gcj-compat: Missing dependency - renders package unusable
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:00:36 +0200
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_20
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.41-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
trying /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java gives me:
error spawning gij
Running with strace shows that the java binary assumes an
unversioned gij binary in /usr/bin
execve("/usr/bin/gij", ["./java
Your message dated Sun, 25 Apr 2004 12:21:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#245720: Missing dependency on libgcj4-dev?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Package: gcj
Version: 4:3.3.3-2
Running gcj gives the following error:
% gcj foo.java -o foo
gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory
% gcj -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.3/specs
Reading specs from libgcj.spec
gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or dir
Right now, if you upgrade "gcc-3.3" from 3.3 to 3.3.1, you can end up with a
broken g++ - it will still search for /3.3/crtbeginS.o instead of
3.3.1/crtbeginS.o. I have the feeling that g++-3.3 should depend on
precisely the same version of gcc-3.3...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software
28 matches
Mail list logo
