Re: RFS: gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg, gcc-4.6-doc, gcc-4.7-doc, gcc-doc-defaults

2012-09-30 Thread Guo Yixuan
, please update to newer version if you downloaded yesterday's. ps. Perhaps I made a mistake when changing subject, so there're no mail with subject: RFS: gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg, gcc-4.6-doc, gcc-4.7-doc, gcc-doc-defaults, but all prefixed with Re:. Regards, Guo Yixuan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: RFS: gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg, gcc-4.6-doc, gcc-4.7-doc, gcc-doc-defaults

2012-09-29 Thread Guo Yixuan
Hi, On 09/28/2012 09:02 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: On 28.09.2012 03:53, Paul Wise wrote: Has the FSF been asked to switch to plain GFDL so that we can move the GCC docs to main? They did that for the autoconf documentation recently. yes. but you may want to try again. No matter whether

Re: RFS: gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg, gcc-4.6-doc, gcc-4.7-doc, gcc-doc-defaults

2012-09-29 Thread Guo Yixuan
On 09/29/2012 05:38 PM, Guo Yixuan wrote: Hi, On 09/28/2012 09:02 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: On 28.09.2012 03:53, Paul Wise wrote: Has the FSF been asked to switch to plain GFDL so that we can move the GCC docs to main? They did that for the autoconf documentation recently. yes. but you