Martin Michlmayr writes:
> Matthias Klose asked me to test gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-16 (4.1.2 20061007)
> to see whether it can be used instead of gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-13 (4.1.2
> 20060901) currently in testing. I found the following three
> regressions, two of which are issues where code is rejected that
> 4
Matthias Klose asked me to test gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-16 (4.1.2 20061007)
to see whether it can be used instead of gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-13 (4.1.2
20060901) currently in testing. I found the following three
regressions, two of which are issues where code is rejected that
4.1.1ds1-13 accepted:
- PR c++/29
2 matches
Mail list logo