Re: TLS. nptl and gcc/glibc/binutils

2003-04-21 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 05:51:37AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 02:18:01PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > > My thought is that gcc-3.3 will be out soon enough for us to use that. > > > But for future coming stable gcc-3.3, we should start to support tls > > and nptl, an

Re: TLS. nptl and gcc/glibc/binutils

2003-04-21 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 02:18:01PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > My thought is that gcc-3.3 will be out soon enough for us to use that. > But for future coming stable gcc-3.3, we should start to support tls > and nptl, and I already start to investigate. I think we should have > two libc6: li

Re: TLS. nptl and gcc/glibc/binutils

2003-04-21 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 20 Apr 2003 18:45:15 -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 12:51:43PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > > >I am wondering if there is a gameplan on adding the support for > > enabling TLS support in the devtools in sid. In particular, in trying > > to build the current debi

Re: TLS. nptl and gcc/glibc/binutils

2003-04-20 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 12:51:43PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >I am wondering if there is a gameplan on adding the support for > enabling TLS support in the devtools in sid. In particular, in trying > to build the current debian glibc cvs 2.3.2-1 release I noticed that > linuxthreads support w

TLS. nptl and gcc/glibc/binutils

2003-04-20 Thread Jack Howarth
I am wondering if there is a gameplan on adding the support for enabling TLS support in the devtools in sid. In particular, in trying to build the current debian glibc cvs 2.3.2-1 release I noticed that linuxthreads support was broken upstream. Uli seems to think this will happen more frequently