Re: a.out target for 2.95

2001-12-13 Thread Martin v. Loewis
> > I would recommend to download an old binary, say from SLS 1.0 or so. > > It will come as a tar file, so it should be easy to install. > > Ok, but what's SLS? Softlanding Linux System, one of the original Linux distributions (with kernels before 1.0). Regards, Martin

Re: a.out target for 2.95

2001-12-13 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 17:47:57 +0300, Wartan Hachaturow wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:04:59PM +0100, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > > I would recommend to download an old binary, say from SLS 1.0 or so. > Ok, but what's SLS? The Softlanding Linux System, a distribution whose 1.03 contained so

Re: a.out target for 2.95

2001-12-13 Thread Wartan Hachaturow
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:04:59PM +0100, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > I would recommend to download an old binary, say from SLS 1.0 or so. > It will come as a tar file, so it should be easy to install. Ok, but what's SLS? -- Regards, Wartan. echo "Your stdio isn't very std." -- L

Re: a.out target for 2.95

2001-12-12 Thread Martin v. Loewis
> What is the best (easiest :) way to get a gcc capable of > producing i386-aout targets? I've apt-getted the source of > gcc-2.95, but it has really scared me, and I didn't found > the way to accomplish this. I would recommend to download an old binary, say from SLS 1.0 or so. It will come as a

Re: a.out target for 2.95

2001-12-12 Thread Alexei Khlebnikov
Wartan Hachaturow wrote: > What is the best (easiest :) way to get a gcc capable of > producing i386-aout targets? I've apt-getted the source of > gcc-2.95, but it has really scared me, and I didn't found > the way to accomplish this. AFAIK, producing i386-aout targets is a linker's, not compiler

a.out target for 2.95

2001-12-12 Thread Wartan Hachaturow
Hello. What is the best (easiest :) way to get a gcc capable of producing i386-aout targets? I've apt-getted the source of gcc-2.95, but it has really scared me, and I didn't found the way to accomplish this. -- Regards, Wartan. "Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are."