Re: Bug#753079: c++11 mode in GCC is still marked as experimental (although armel needs work)

2014-07-14 Thread Guo Yixuan
Hi, On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Guo Yixuan wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:00:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >> > I would rather drop any package which does use c++11 features without any >> > reflection. >> >> I now unders

Re: Bug#753079: c++11 mode in GCC is still marked as experimental (although armel needs work)

2014-07-13 Thread Guo Yixuan
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi > > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:00:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > I would rather drop any package which does use c++11 features without any > > reflection. > > I now understand the problem. Thanks. > > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:10:5

Re: Bug#753079: c++11 mode in GCC is still marked as experimental (although armel needs work)

2014-07-12 Thread Guo Yixuan
Control: forwarded 754199 https://code.google.com/p/rimeime/issues/detail?id=632 Control: tag 754199 + upstream Hello, On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Hi > > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:00:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > I would rather drop any package which does use

Re: c++11 mode in GCC is still marked as experimental (although armel needs work)

2014-07-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:00:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 00:08:28 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > But this seems toi be a bug porter amd GCC maintainer has to address. > > If they can not, we should drop armel from Debian. > I would rather drop any package which does

Re: c++11 mode in GCC is still marked as experimental (although armel needs work)

2014-07-12 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:00:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > I would rather drop any package which does use c++11 features without any > reflection. I now understand the problem. Thanks. On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:10:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > No, just because some random c++1

c++11 mode in GCC is still marked as experimental (although armel needs work)

2014-07-12 Thread Matthias Klose
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 00:08:28 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > But this seems toi be a bug porter amd GCC maintainer has to address. > If they can not, we should drop armel from Debian. I would rather drop any package which does use c++11 features without any reflection. The c++11 status in GCC (and