Re: g++ 2.95 and g++ 3.0

2001-11-05 Thread Alexei Khlebnikov
Martin v. Loewis wrote: When compiling the same programs with these compilers, g++ 2.95 is much (sometimes 3 times) faster than g++ 3.0, even without optimizing (without -O). Not sure what you asking. Are you saying g++ 2.95 is faster, or that the generated code is faster? Why is it

Re: g++ 2.95 and g++ 3.0

2001-11-05 Thread Martin v. Loewis
Why is it happening? Is it so because of more complex templates in recent libstdc++? If you are asking for compilation speed, yes, the main cause it that libstdc++ consists of many more templates now. If you are asking for a slow-down in an application, you need to provide detailed

g++ 2.95 and g++ 3.0

2001-11-02 Thread Alexei Khlebnikov
Hello all. When compiling the same programs with these compilers, g++ 2.95 is much (sometimes 3 times) faster than g++ 3.0, even without optimizing (without -O). Why is it happening? Is it so because of more complex templates in recent libstdc++? Is g++ 3.0 really a step further ? Regards,

Re: g++ 2.95 and g++ 3.0

2001-11-02 Thread Martin v. Loewis
When compiling the same programs with these compilers, g++ 2.95 is much (sometimes 3 times) faster than g++ 3.0, even without optimizing (without -O). Not sure what you asking. Are you saying g++ 2.95 is faster, or that the generated code is faster? Why is it happening? Is it so because of