Re: [parisc-linux] Re: gcc-3.? compiler for hppa (3.1, 3.1+dwarf2, 3.2cvs20020429?)

2002-05-08 Thread John David Anglin
I still haven't figured out why libstdc++ needs to be installed prior to running the testsuite. That's weird... nothing immediately comes to mind. LD_RUN_PATH in the environment is the culprit. Dave -- J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Research

Re: [parisc-linux] Re: gcc-3.? compiler for hppa (3.1, 3.1+dwarf2, 3.2cvs20020429?)

2002-05-06 Thread Phil Edwards
i am concerned that between gcc versions, there are often changes in the C++ (and maybe others) ABI, and moving all of our packages to the new version is likely going to be a painful process. If the g++-3.2 ABI is already frozen (?) The C++ ABI is done, but there were minor bugs in 3.0's

Re: [parisc-linux] gcc-3.? compiler for hppa (3.1, 3.1+dwarf2, 3.2cvs20020429?)

2002-05-05 Thread Matthias Klose
John David Anglin writes: While preparing gcc-3.1 packages I noticed many eh-related regressions fixed in the trunk, when dwarf2 support was added. With Dave's guidance I made a diff of the pa subdirectory from the trunk and applied it to the branch. Although many FAILS are gone, there are

Re: [parisc-linux] gcc-3.? compiler for hppa (3.1, 3.1+dwarf2, 3.2cvs20020429?)

2002-05-05 Thread John David Anglin
this is a diff of the test results for b and c. g++ is worse, the I think all the new g++ fails are in new tests. So, I don't think g++ is actually worse. regressions for g77 and gcc are new test cases in the trunk. One new gcc regression: Yes, gcc.c-torture/compile/2504-1.c is a

Re: [parisc-linux] gcc-3.? compiler for hppa (3.1, 3.1+dwarf2, 3.2cvs20020429?)

2002-05-05 Thread Matthias Klose
John David Anglin writes: Thanks. Could you try the following patch, please? yes, allows the bootstrap. --- 5ntaprop.adb.~1.3.~ Sun Mar 17 09:08:21 2002 +++ 5ntaprop.adb Sun Apr 28 22:42:59 2002 @@ -45,9 +45,6 @@ -- used for Ada_Task_Control_Block -- Task_ID

Re: [parisc-linux] gcc-3.? compiler for hppa (3.1, 3.1+dwarf2, 3.2cvs20020429?)

2002-05-05 Thread Grant Grundler
Matthias Klose wrote: Sm9obiBEYXZpZCBBbmdsaW4gd3JpdGVzOg0KPiA+IFdoaWxlIHByZXBhcmluZyBnY2MtMy4x IHBhY2thZ2VzIEkgbm90aWNlZCBtYW55IGVoLXJlbGF0ZWQgcmVncmVzc2lvbnMNCj4gPiBm ... Matthias (and others), base64 encoded email doesn't archive well:

gcc-3.? compiler for hppa (3.1, 3.1+dwarf2, 3.2cvs20020429?)

2002-05-04 Thread Matthias Klose
While preparing gcc-3.1 packages I noticed many eh-related regressions fixed in the trunk, when dwarf2 support was added. With Dave's guidance I made a diff of the pa subdirectory from the trunk and applied it to the branch. Although many FAILS are gone, there are some new (diff below). I would

Re: [parisc-linux] Re: gcc-3.? compiler for hppa (3.1, 3.1+dwarf2, 3.2cvs20020429?)

2002-05-04 Thread John David Anglin
i am concerned that between gcc versions, there are often changes in the C++ (and maybe others) ABI, and moving all of our packages to the new version is likely going to be a painful process. If the g++-3.2 ABI is already frozen (?) and we move directly to it then we may save ourselves some

Re: [parisc-linux] gcc-3.? compiler for hppa (3.1, 3.1+dwarf2, 3.2cvs20020429?)

2002-05-04 Thread John David Anglin
While preparing gcc-3.1 packages I noticed many eh-related regressions fixed in the trunk, when dwarf2 support was added. With Dave's guidance I made a diff of the pa subdirectory from the trunk and applied it to the branch. Although many FAILS are gone, there are some new (diff below). In