Your message dated Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:55:40 +0300
with message-id <20200722105540.GA15618@localhost>
and subject line Fixed in 9.3.0-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #942607,
regarding GDC generates duplicate symbols when using mixins/interfaces
to be marked as done.
This means that you
ackage like gtk-d because it generates
>>>> duplicate non-weak symbols in object files, causing a collision when
>>>> linking. This seems to happen when using mixins / interfaces.
>>>> For more information and a workaround, please check the upstream bug
>>>
Severity: serious
Hi!
Currently, GDC can't build package like gtk-d because it generates
duplicate non-weak symbols in object files, causing a collision when
linking. This seems to happen when using mixins / interfaces.
For more information and a workaround, please check the upstream bug report.
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi!
> > Currently, GDC can't build package like gtk-d because it generates
> > duplicate non-weak symbols in object files, causing a collision when
> > linking. This seems to happen when using mixins / interfaces.
> > For
Processing control commands:
> found -1 9.2.1-16
Bug #944380 [gdc-9] GDC generates duplicate symbols when using mixins/interfaces
Bug #942607 [gdc-9] gtk-d FTBFS on armhf, multiple definition errors.
Marked as found in versions gcc-9/9.2.1-16.
Marked as found in versions gcc-9/9.2.1
-weak symbols in object files, causing a collision when
linking. This seems to happen when using mixins / interfaces.
For more information and a workaround, please check the upstream bug report.
if there's a workaround, please don't set the severity to serious.
Package: gdc-9
Version: 9.2.1-17
Severity: serious
Hi!
Currently, GDC can't build package like gtk-d because it generates
duplicate non-weak symbols in object files, causing a collision when
linking. This seems to happen when using mixins / interfaces.
For more information and a worka
Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:53:22 +0200
with message-id <20101021155322.ga60...@l04.local>
and subject line Re: Bug#600921: libppl7: libppl should be configured with
--enable-interfaces=c
has caused the Debian Bug report #600921,
regarding libppl7: libppl should be configure
with
--enable-interfaces=c at least. These functions are gcc-4.5 -g -DIN_GCC -W
-Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros
-Wno-overlength-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wc++-compat -fno
Tanttrik Esoteriicism and Western Approach.www.45meds . net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
cleared "final static".
Closes: #351512.
+ PR java/22507, segfault building Apache Cocoon. Closes: #318534.
+ PR java/2499, class members should be inherited from implemented
interfaces. Closes: #225434.
+ PR java/10581, ICE compiling freen
--
Bug 2499 depends on bug 28067, which changed state.
Bug 28067 Summary: [meta-bug] Tracking bug for ecj fixes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28067
What|Old Value |New Value
-
--- Comment #10 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:43 ---
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks.
--
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|28067 |
nThis||
BugsThisDependsOn|
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||28067
nThis||
http://gcc.gn
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-27
20:46 ---
Another testcase for the same issue:
interface I {
interface Inner {}
}
class Test implements I {
void test(Inner i) { }
}
Which comes from PR 23596.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-27
20:45 ---
*** Bug 23596 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-10
23:55 ---
And now it just rejects it.
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||18131
nThis||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2499
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|dhazeghi at yahoo dot com |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2499
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You ar
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugs at skyluc dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2499
--- You are receiving this mail b
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-20
16:05 ---
I should note that it now ICE on the mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-20
23:44 ---
*** Bug 9869 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-01
08:14 ---
Very related to bug 9869.
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2003-12-17 05:00:30
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-30
17:21 ---
*** Bug 13513 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-30
17:21 ---
This is a dup of bug 2499.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 2499 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
---
Package: gcj-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-1.bunk.2
Severity: normal
the compilation of
A.java:
interface A {
static class B {
}
}
C.java:
interface C extends A {
B getB();
}
D.java:
class D {
public static void main (String[] argv) {
Object o = new C() {
public B g
27 matches
Mail list logo
