On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> If you do, please look at devel.linuxppc.com/users/fsirl/ for a current
> version of the patch.
Tried the new one and it still dies. I'll break it down and see what is
causing the failure. Obviously, we can rule out the rs6000-specific
patches, s
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 12:00:37AM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > Does the current source version (-8) work ok on all architectures?
> > I remember someone of you said something about non applicable
> > patches, or an out of date patch f
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Does the current source version (-8) work ok on all architectures?
> I remember someone of you said something about non applicable
> patches, or an out of date patch from Franz Sirl.
> Recent binaries exist for the hurd, i386, mips and sparc.
The patc
Does the current source version (-8) work ok on all architectures?
I remember someone of you said something about non applicable
patches, or an out of date patch from Franz Sirl.
Recent binaries exist for the hurd, i386, mips and sparc.
this patch is already fixed in CVS:
Torsten Landschoff write
4 matches
Mail list logo
