Hi,
On 24/05/14 22:42, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
The issue with running the GCC testsuite on kfreebsd-amd64 buildds is
being fixed by FreeBSD upstream, and on Debian buildds within 1-2 weeks.
Both of the kfreebsd-amd64 buildds have been patched for this issue now;
kfreebsd-i386 wasn't
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:25:02PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I would like to see some partial test rebuilds (like buildd or minimal chroot
packages) for other architectures. Any possibility to setup such a test
rebuild
for some architectures by the porters? Afaics the results for the GCC
I tested to build kernel for Loongson 3 with gcc-4.9. it works fine.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Adam Conrad adcon...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:25:02PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I would like to see some partial test rebuilds (like buildd or minimal chroot
packages)
Hi,
On 08/05/14 16:25, Matthias Klose wrote:
I would like to see some partial test rebuilds (like buildd or minimal chroot
packages) for other architectures. Any possibility to setup such a test
rebuild
for some architectures by the porters? Afaics the results for the GCC
testsuite
look
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 02:56:39PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
With gcc-4.9 now available in testing, it is time to prepare for the change of
the default to 4.9, for a subset of architectures or for all (release)
architectures. The defaults for the gdc, gccgo, gcj and gnat frontends
already
+++ Matthias Klose [2014-05-13 14:56 +0200]:
With gcc-4.9 now available in testing, it is time to prepare for the change of
the default to 4.9, for a subset of architectures or for all (release)
architectures. The defaults for the gdc, gccgo, gcj and gnat frontends
already
point to 4.9 and
With gcc-4.9 now available in testing, it is time to prepare for the change of
the default to 4.9, for a subset of architectures or for all (release)
architectures. The defaults for the gdc, gccgo, gcj and gnat frontends already
point to 4.9 and are used on all architectures. Issue #746805
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
With gcc-4.9 now available in testing, it is time to prepare for the change of
the default to 4.9, for a subset of architectures or for all (release)
architectures. The defaults for the gdc, gccgo, gcj and gnat frontends
Am 13.05.2014 17:44, schrieb Yunqiang Su:
Do you plan make 4.9 the only version of gcc in jessie?
This first depends on building the kernel, both linux and kfreebsd, and eglibc
using gcc-4.9.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
Am 13.05.2014 17:44, schrieb Yunqiang Su:
Do you plan make 4.9 the only version of gcc in jessie?
This first depends on building the kernel, both linux and kfreebsd, and eglibc
using gcc-4.9.
I tried build eglibc with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Matthias Klose wrote:
With gcc-4.9 now available in testing, it is time to prepare for the change of
the default to 4.9, for a subset of architectures or for all (release)
architectures. The defaults for the gdc, gccgo, gcj and gnat frontends
With gcc-4.9 now available in testing, it is time to prepare for the change of
the default to 4.9, for a subset of architectures or for all (release)
architectures. The defaults for the gdc, gccgo, gcj and gnat frontends already
point to 4.9 and are used on all architectures. Issue #746805
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
With gcc-4.9 now available in testing, it is time to prepare for the change of
the default to 4.9, for a subset of architectures or for all (release)
architectures. The defaults for the gdc, gccgo, gcj and gnat frontends
(excluding d-release for what they hatingly call “debian-ports spam”)
Matthias Klose dixit:
I would like to see some partial test rebuilds (like buildd or minimal chroot
Haven’t tried yet, but Helmut Grohne does automated rebootstrapping of
some ports using what he can get his hands on, and he
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:49:51PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Matthias Klose dixit:
I would like to see some partial test rebuilds (like buildd or minimal chroot
Haven???t tried yet, but Helmut Grohne does automated rebootstrapping of
some ports using what he can get his hands on, and
15 matches
Mail list logo