Re: the mangling of ‘va_lis t’ has changed in GCC 4.4

2010-01-28 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Matthias Klose , 2010-01-27, 23:25: IMO the major work is to identify affected libraries. if this is done, you can decide if binNMUs or manual creation of aliases is the bigger pain. On some other architectures (like amd64) std::va_list is already mangled to something easily greppable. This

Re: the mangling of ‘va_lis t’ has changed in GCC 4.4

2010-01-27 Thread Riku Voipio
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:19:35PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: > Hello, > > On trečiadienis 27 Sausis 2010 22:47:55 Riku Voipio wrote: > > There is a major problem with gcc 4.4 and armel - the ABI of va_list > > changed (for c++ libraries). We need to decide one of the following: > > > > 1) li

Re: the mangling of ‘va_lis t’ has changed in GCC 4.4

2010-01-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:47:55PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > There is a major problem with gcc 4.4 and armel - the ABI of va_list > changed (for c++ libraries). We need to decide one of the following: What exactly have changed? The ABI (as said in the sentence before) or the mangling. > 1) li