Re: update_excuses: -gcc

2003-04-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Anthony Towns writes: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 01:00:31AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > ] stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/m68k-linux/bin/ -DIN_GCC-O2 -W -Wall > > > -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional > > > -pedantic -Wno-long-long -DHAVE_CONFIG_H-I

Re: update_excuses: -gcc

2003-04-16 Thread Anthony Towns
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 01:00:31AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > ] stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/m68k-linux/bin/ -DIN_GCC-O2 -W -Wall > > -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional > > -pedantic -Wno-long-long -DHAVE_CONFIG_H-I. -I. -I../../src/gcc > > -I.

Re: update_excuses: -gcc

2003-04-15 Thread Matthias Klose
Anthony Towns writes: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:45:46AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > # -gcc (2.95.2-20 to -) > > * Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers > > * Boss says I shouldn't remove gcc > > * Not considered > > This is still in update_excuses, although the package is removed

Re: update_excuses: -gcc

2003-04-15 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:45:46AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > # -gcc (2.95.2-20 to -) > * Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers > * Boss says I shouldn't remove gcc > * Not considered > This is still in update_excuses, although the package is removed in > unstable. Yes, the exception

update_excuses: -gcc

2003-04-15 Thread Matthias Klose
# -gcc (2.95.2-20 to -) * Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers * Boss says I shouldn't remove gcc * Not considered This is still in update_excuses, although the package is removed in unstable. As I see both libgcc1 built from 3.2 and 3.3 in the package pool, is it possible to move th