Re: osm-tile-server

2015-11-10 Thread Jochen Topf
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 09:46:58PM +0100, Ruben Undheim wrote: > Good point. We should have proper attribution to Geofabrik. I was thinking > about this a while ago, but then I forgot about it again... We should > explicitly ask to get permission to use it. (I see now that you're actually > one >

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-11-10 Thread Ruben Undheim
st from a > quick look at the scripts: You are offering the user a choice on installation > whether they want download immediately or later. I would remove that choice > and always do download later. Less choice makes things easier for users. One of the goals of the package was to be ab

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-11-10 Thread Jochen Topf
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 08:53:56AM +0100, Ruben Undheim wrote: > git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-grass/osm-tile-server.git I just committed some changes, mostly just made the spacing consistent. I saw you hardcoded the Geofabrik download server in there including a list of all regions it

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-11-09 Thread Ruben Undheim
f mapnik has been > > uploaded. :D > > Since a good Mapnik is now in experimental, osm-tile-server can in theory > be uploaded to experimental. However, I would like to see some other people > in the team testing the package first and come with some feedback. Is there > an

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-11-09 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi, > Then we can go ahead as soon as a new version of mapnik has been > uploaded. :D Since a good Mapnik is now in experimental, osm-tile-server can in theory be uploaded to experimental. However, I would like to see some other people in the team testing the package first and come wit

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-11-03 Thread Ruben Undheim
799473? I just now confirmed that the issue in Mapnik has been fixed upstream and I finally got osm-tile-server working in sid. I degraded #799473 to minor and filed #803985 instead [1]. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803985 > > Still, the package will correctly set

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-11-03 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
is just another package it will also have to pass the NEW queue like any other package. > 2. Some Mapnik issues in sid currently makes it not fully work. What issues are those other than #799473? > Still, the package will correctly set up the database with OSM > data and configure ap

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-11-03 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi, I begin to feel that osm-tile-server is getting ready. I've been using it on several computers myself and it simplifies things a lot for me. There are just a few questions I'm wondering about: 1. I've 'designed' it as a native package. Quite much of the '

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-09-19 Thread Ruben Undheim
nstreetmap-carto-common or something similar (or perhaps > openstreetmap-carto vs openstreetmap-carto-config). Then users who > just want an OSM tile server up running can just install > osm-tile-server which pulls in -common, while the more advanced user > can install openstreetmap-car

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-09-08 Thread Ruben Undheim
he user. This is a very good idea. It will provide full flexibility. All the reusable things should be in a separate package called openstreetmap-carto-common or something similar (or perhaps openstreetmap-carto vs openstreetmap-carto-config). Then users who just want an OSM tile server up running

Broken links in OSM wik ipage (Was: osm-tile-server)

2015-09-08 Thread sebastic
On 2015-09-08 12:40, Chris Bannister wrote: Excuse me for interrupting, but I've just tried some of the links on: https://wiki.debian.org/OSM/ and heaps don't work. Don't know if it's a problem my end or what. e.g. No, it's just outdated information. The OSM team isn't active anymore, that's w

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-09-08 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 07:45:17PM +0200, Ruben Undheim wrote: > Thanks for responding so quickly, Christopher. > > > This sounds really good! I was working towards this direction also, this > > is why I packaged openstreetmap-carto. I have also written some > > documentation on the wiki as a stop

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-09-07 Thread Christopher Baines
e, openstreetmap-carto can handle regeneration of the >> copies when the package updated, such that they don't get ignored or out >> of sync. > > Regeneration of the files when it is upgraded is very conveniently > handled by dpkg triggers. This is what I have done for > osm-til

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-09-07 Thread Ruben Undheim
; copies when the package updated, such that they don't get ignored or out > of sync. Regeneration of the files when it is upgraded is very conveniently handled by dpkg triggers. This is what I have done for osm-tile-server. > In summary, trying to avoid using the openstreetmap-cart

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-09-07 Thread Christopher Baines
ing so, as it might help you when looking at configuring >> tilelite (it handles multiple tilesets). > > Thanks for this. It may turn out very useful for osm-tile-server! > > I've looked at it now more in detail. The config code for tilelite > does not run when I install

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-09-07 Thread Ruben Undheim
g > tilelite (it handles multiple tilesets). Thanks for this. It may turn out very useful for osm-tile-server! I've looked at it now more in detail. The config code for tilelite does not run when I install the package, but I have started graping what you are doing there by reading the code

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-09-06 Thread Christopher Baines
On 06/09/15 21:15, Ruben Undheim wrote: >>> What I intended with the packages I've been working on was that the >>> tilelite package itself does not install any daemon process, but the >>> "osm-tile-server-tilelite" package installs the daemon process. &g

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-09-06 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 06-09-15 22:15, Ruben Undheim wrote: >>> What I intended with the packages I've been working on was that the >>> tilelite package itself does not install any daemon process, but the >>> "osm-tile-server-tilelite" package installs the daemon process. &g

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-09-06 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi, >> What I intended with the packages I've been working on was that the >> tilelite package itself does not install any daemon process, but the >> "osm-tile-server-tilelite" package installs the daemon process. >> osm-tile-server-tilelite depends on bo

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-09-06 Thread Christopher Baines
o is configured, and the data files fetched. > > What I intended with the packages I've been working on was that the > tilelite package itself does not install any daemon process, but the > "osm-tile-server-tilelite" package installs the daemon process. > osm-til

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-09-06 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Ruben, Thanks for working on this, it should significantly lower the barrier to setting up an OSM tileserver. I applaud this effort very much. I think your general approach is sane. We'll likely need to integrate the respective packages (mapnik, openstreetmap-carto, tile{cache,lite,stache}, os

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-09-06 Thread Ruben Undheim
ge itself does not install any daemon process, but the "osm-tile-server-tilelite" package installs the daemon process. osm-tile-server-tilelite depends on both osm-tile-server-base and tilelite, and osm-tile-server-base itself depends on openstreetmap-carto. This means that both openstreet

Re: osm-tile-server

2015-09-06 Thread Christopher Baines
On 06/09/15 17:38, Ruben Undheim wrote: > I've been working some days on a native Debian package for setting up > an OSM tile server. > The idea is to be able to support several tile providers, but > currently only tilelite is supported. > > The code is here: https://git

osm-tile-server

2015-09-06 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi, I've been working some days on a native Debian package for setting up an OSM tile server. The idea is to be able to support several tile providers, but currently only tilelite is supported. The code is here: https://github.com/rubund/osm-tile-server It consists of three binary pac