Package: bigloo,libc6
Severity: grave
Version: 2.5b+really2.5c-beta-2002-10-18-1
I've encountered this problem while trying to compile scribe.
Full build log is available at:
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/software/failed-log/scribe.log
It seems to be some internal symbol.
.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 166137 bigloo
Bug#166137: bigloo fails to run
Bug reassigned from package `bigloo,libc6' to `bigloo'.
> severity 166137 normal
Bug#166137: bigloo fails to run
Severity set to `normal'.
> merge 165837 166137
Bug#165837: bigloo: relocation erro
Package: bigloo,libc6
Severity: grave
Version: 2.5b+really2.5c-beta-2002-10-18-1
I've encountered this problem while trying to compile scribe.
Full build log is available at:
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/software/failed-log/scribe.log
It seems to be some internal symbol.
.
Package: locales
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux firestorm 2.4.18 #1 Sun May 19 20:13:22 BST 2002 i686
unknown
The package won't install on a system that;'s been dist-upgraded from Potato
to Woody.
firestorm:/# apt-get install local
Package: locales
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux firestorm 2.4.18 #1 Sun May 19 20:13:22 BST 2002 i686 unknown
The package won't install on a system that;'s been dist-upgraded from Potato
to Woody.
firestorm:/# apt-get install locale
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:18:48PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> > I just downloaded the latest beta version of bigloo and recompiled
> > it with libc6 2.3. I no longer recieve any error messages when i
> > use the compiler. It appears that a simple recompilation may be
> > the only thing needed to
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:45:13PM -0700, Joseph Donaldson wrote:
> Yan,
> I just downloaded the latest beta version of bigloo
> and recompiled it with libc6 2.3. I no longer recieve
> any error messages when i use the compiler. It appears
> that a simple recompilation may be the only thing
> neede
Uh, I'm stupid. Here we go.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--- nss_db-2.2/Makefile.am.bak 2000-08-15 10:18:16.0 -0400
+++ nss_db-2.2/Makefile.am 2002-10-23 16:43:46.0 -0400
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
noinst_HEADERS = db
Here's a patch. It works, too - it's running on voltaire with glibc 2.3.1
now. This patch is _required_ to use libnss-db with glibc 2.3.1; should
glibc conflict with older versions of nss-db?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:18:48PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> > I just downloaded the latest beta version of bigloo and recompiled
> > it with libc6 2.3. I no longer recieve any error messages when i
> > use the compiler. It appears that a simple recompilation may be
> > the only thing needed to
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:45:13PM -0700, Joseph Donaldson wrote:
> Yan,
> I just downloaded the latest beta version of bigloo
> and recompiled it with libc6 2.3. I no longer recieve
> any error messages when i use the compiler. It appears
> that a simple recompilation may be the only thing
> neede
Uh, I'm stupid. Here we go.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--- nss_db-2.2/Makefile.am.bak 2000-08-15 10:18:16.0 -0400
+++ nss_db-2.2/Makefile.am 2002-10-23 16:43:46.0 -0400
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
noinst_HEADERS = d
Here's a patch. It works, too - it's running on voltaire with glibc 2.3.1
now. This patch is _required_ to use libnss-db with glibc 2.3.1; should
glibc conflict with older versions of nss-db?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--
To UN
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:45:37PM -0500, Zed Pobre wrote:
> This is a major problem -- this means that producers of
> binary-only software have no way of reliably producing a working
> binary under an arbitrary Debian release (or, for that matter, under
> any glibc-based distribution), and wh
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:45:37PM -0500, Zed Pobre wrote:
> This is a major problem -- this means that producers of
> binary-only software have no way of reliably producing a working
> binary under an arbitrary Debian release (or, for that matter, under
> any glibc-based distribution), and wh
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:03:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 04:35:55PM +0200, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> >
> > I have cadp tool, that is also statically linked. It crashes on sig segv.
> > Strace shows that it crashes after it open and mmap /lib/ld_linux.so
> >
> >
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 04:35:55PM +0200, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
>
> I have cadp tool, that is also statically linked. It crashes on sig segv.
> Strace shows that it crashes after it open and mmap /lib/ld_linux.so
>
> open("/lib/ld-linux.so.2", O_RDONLY)= 5
> fstat(5, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, s
I forgot to say I'm using libc6 version 2.3.1-3
--
Lukáš Hejtmánek
I have cadp tool, that is also statically linked. It crashes on sig segv.
Strace shows that it crashes after it open and mmap /lib/ld_linux.so
open("/lib/ld-linux.so.2", O_RDONLY)= 5
fstat(5, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=83504, ...}) = 0
read(5, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:03:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 04:35:55PM +0200, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> >
> > I have cadp tool, that is also statically linked. It crashes on sig segv.
> > Strace shows that it crashes after it open and mmap /lib/ld_linux.so
> >
> >
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 04:35:55PM +0200, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
>
> I have cadp tool, that is also statically linked. It crashes on sig segv.
> Strace shows that it crashes after it open and mmap /lib/ld_linux.so
>
> open("/lib/ld-linux.so.2", O_RDONLY)= 5
> fstat(5, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, s
I forgot to say I'm using libc6 version 2.3.1-3
--
Lukáš Hejtmánek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have cadp tool, that is also statically linked. It crashes on sig segv.
Strace shows that it crashes after it open and mmap /lib/ld_linux.so
open("/lib/ld-linux.so.2", O_RDONLY)= 5
fstat(5, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=83504, ...}) = 0
read(5, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\
The following lets me believe the POSIX regex function breakage has
nothing to do with locales:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>LANG= LC_ALL= locale
LANG=
LC_CTYPE=""
LC_NUMERIC=""
LC_TIME=""
LC_COLLATE=""
LC_MONETARY=""
LC_MESSAGES=""
LC_PAPER=""
LC_NAME=""
LC_ADDRESS=""
LC_TELEPHONE=""
LC_MEASUREMENT=""
LC_ID
The following lets me believe the POSIX regex function breakage has
nothing to do with locales:
[guus@haplo]~>LANG= LC_ALL= locale
LANG=
LC_CTYPE=""
LC_NUMERIC=""
LC_TIME=""
LC_COLLATE=""
LC_MONETARY=""
LC_MESSAGES=""
LC_PAPER=""
LC_NAME=""
LC_ADDRESS=""
LC_TELEPHONE=""
LC_MEASUREMENT=""
LC_IDENTI
25 matches
Mail list logo