Your message dated Mon, 02 Dec 2002 14:16:53 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170635: libc6 2.3.1-3 to 2.3.1-5 upgrade breaks
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 02:16:46PM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > > * #167794: Wrong Pre-Depends
> > > Package: libc6; Severity: critical; Reported by: Martin Schulze
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 25 days old.
> > > Looks like this might be a problem in the buildd setup? There's not
> > >
On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 21:19, Magnus Danielson wrote:
> rm /lib/ld-2.3.1.so
>
> I got the "Device or resource busy" message as a reply. It's because the file
> is in use by many tools:
That shouldn't happen. "File in use" != "name in use". rm removes names,
not files.
And you using something wei
Your message dated Mon, 02 Dec 2002 14:16:53 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170635: libc6 2.3.1-3 to 2.3.1-5 upgrade breaks
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
From: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#170635: libc6 2.3.1-3 to 2.3.1-5 upgrade breaks
Date: 25 Nov 2002 06:58:16 -0500
Hi Jeff,
> On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 02:03, Magnus Danielson wrote:
>
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.3.1-5
> > Severity: critical
> >
> > On upgrading my Debian
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 02:16:46PM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > > * #167794: Wrong Pre-Depends
> > > Package: libc6; Severity: critical; Reported by: Martin Schulze
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 25 days old.
> > > Looks like this might be a problem in the buildd setup? There's not
> > > enou
From: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#170635: libc6 2.3.1-3 to 2.3.1-5 upgrade breaks
Date: 25 Nov 2002 06:58:16 -0500
Hi Jeff,
> On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 02:03, Magnus Danielson wrote:
>
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.3.1-5
> > Severity: critical
> >
> > On upgrading my Debian
Hello, I have the same problems with the Siag suite. I think the problem
is related to the new release of glibc, where stat and other symbols are
not defined as functions in the dynamic library. They are just declared
as inlined #defines in stat.h and must be compiled statically. Really
glibc 2
--- Begin Message ---
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ok, I'm forwarding this to Martin and Phil, two upstream developers
> (hopefully still ;-) listening on debian-gcc.
I would suggest that the libstdc++ autoconf test should be enhanced:
_GLIBCPP_HAVE_ACOSL should not be defined if
Hello, I have the same problems with the Siag suite. I think the problem
is related to the new release of glibc, where stat and other symbols are
not defined as functions in the dynamic library. They are just declared
as inlined #defines in stat.h and must be compiled statically. Really
glibc
--- Begin Message ---
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ok, I'm forwarding this to Martin and Phil, two upstream developers
> (hopefully still ;-) listening on debian-gcc.
I would suggest that the libstdc++ autoconf test should be enhanced:
_GLIBCPP_HAVE_ACOSL should not be defined if
I can reproduce this on both woody and sid.
It seems like preconfiguring fails for locales. Whatever locales I
select in the preconfig stage, they are not entered in /etc/locale.gen.
Selecting locales in a dpkg-reconfigure run works fine,
though.
--
Kind regards,
+
I think I read somewhere that there is a problem with one of the libraries
causing APT-GET UPDATE to fial. I keep getting the same error; UNABLE TO
PARSE PACKAGE FILE /VAR/LIB/DPKG/STATUS (1). I would really appreciate
someone telling me how to resolve this. I am running the testing (with so
I can reproduce this on both woody and sid.
It seems like preconfiguring fails for locales. Whatever locales I
select in the preconfig stage, they are not entered in /etc/locale.gen.
Selecting locales in a dpkg-reconfigure run works fine,
though.
--
Kind regards,
+
I think I read somewhere that there is a problem with one of the libraries
causing APT-GET UPDATE to fial. I keep getting the same error; UNABLE TO
PARSE PACKAGE FILE /VAR/LIB/DPKG/STATUS (1). I would really appreciate
someone telling me how to resolve this. I am running the testing (with so
15 matches
Mail list logo
