Bug#79358: is select still broken on hurd ?

2003-01-29 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
Is select() still broken on hurd ? Try the quoted program and you will know. And if you do try it, tell us! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#79358: is select still broken on hurd ?

2003-01-29 Thread Junichi Uekawa
At Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:14:21 +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: Is select() still broken on hurd ? Try the quoted program and you will know. And if you do try it, tell us! I don't run hurd. I've been walking over old bug reports. regards, junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#79358: is select still broken on hurd ?

2003-01-29 Thread Joachim Nilsson
Hi Junichi! It appears that select() still might be broken. The tests I did with the attached code, as well as an example in the select manpage on Hurd, indeed fails. Funny thing is that for any value of tv_sec 0 it works OK. And for any value of tv_usec 999 (when tv_sec is zero) it also

Processing of glibc_2.3.1-10_arm.changes

2003-01-29 Thread Archive Administrator
glibc_2.3.1-10_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libc6_2.3.1-10_arm.deb libc-udeb_2.3.1-10_arm.udeb libc6-dev_2.3.1-10_arm.deb libc6-prof_2.3.1-10_arm.deb libc6-dbg_2.3.1-10_arm.deb libc6-pic_2.3.1-10_arm.deb nscd_2.3.1-10_arm.deb Greetings,

glibc_2.3.1-10_arm.changes ACCEPTED

2003-01-29 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: libc-udeb_2.3.1-10_arm.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.1-10_arm.udeb libc6-dbg_2.3.1-10_arm.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.1-10_arm.deb libc6-dev_2.3.1-10_arm.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.1-10_arm.deb libc6-pic_2.3.1-10_arm.deb to

Bug#171659: status of this bug report ?

2003-01-29 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:09:53PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: I've been looking at this bug report, but the SunRPC code seems to restrict only the redistribution of modified work as SunRPC itself, and does not restrict redistribution as glibc, and I would have thought that shouldn't be a

Bug#178746: dpkg-reconfigure does not work

2003-01-29 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:15:01 +0200, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, +15:54:18 EET (UTC +0200), GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] pressed some keys: At Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:02:56 +0200, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: Package: locales Version: 2.3.1-10 If I give

Bug#178960: libc6-dev: sys/stat.h: lstat declaration omitted with -ansi compiler option

2003-01-29 Thread Jeff Sheinberg
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.2.5-14.3 Severity: normal Hi, When I include sys/stat.h and also specify the -ansi option to the C compiler, then the declaration for the lstat function is omitted. Note that the declaration for the fstat function is properly generated, regardless of whether the