Is select() still broken on hurd ?
Try the quoted program and you will know. And if you do try it, tell
us!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:14:21 +0100,
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
Is select() still broken on hurd ?
Try the quoted program and you will know. And if you do try it, tell
us!
I don't run hurd.
I've been walking over old bug reports.
regards,
junichi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Junichi!
It appears that select() still might be broken. The
tests I did with the attached code, as well as an
example in the select manpage on Hurd, indeed fails.
Funny thing is that for any value of tv_sec 0 it
works OK. And for any value of tv_usec 999 (when
tv_sec is zero) it also
glibc_2.3.1-10_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libc6_2.3.1-10_arm.deb
libc-udeb_2.3.1-10_arm.udeb
libc6-dev_2.3.1-10_arm.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.1-10_arm.deb
libc6-dbg_2.3.1-10_arm.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.1-10_arm.deb
nscd_2.3.1-10_arm.deb
Greetings,
Accepted:
libc-udeb_2.3.1-10_arm.udeb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.1-10_arm.udeb
libc6-dbg_2.3.1-10_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.1-10_arm.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.1-10_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.1-10_arm.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.1-10_arm.deb
to
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:09:53PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I've been looking at this bug report, but the SunRPC code
seems to restrict only the redistribution of modified work
as SunRPC itself, and does not restrict redistribution as
glibc, and I would have thought that shouldn't be a
At Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:15:01 +0200,
Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, +15:54:18 EET (UTC +0200),
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] pressed some keys:
At Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:02:56 +0200,
Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.1-10
If I give
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.2.5-14.3
Severity: normal
Hi,
When I include sys/stat.h and also specify the -ansi option to
the C compiler, then the declaration for the lstat function is
omitted.
Note that the declaration for the fstat function is properly
generated, regardless of whether the
8 matches
Mail list logo