Your message dated Thu, 20 Feb 2003 08:58:22 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#181683: libc6: Postinst fails if /etc/rcS.d missing.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
sunrpc/svc_udp uses sendmsg when sending a reply to a rpc/udb request so
that it can set the source address (using a PKTINFO control message) of the
reply to match the destination address of the request. This is good.
The way it does
At Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:54:45 +0100,
Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:17:49AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> [..snip..]
> > Curious, how did you construct the list of symbols for each arch?
>
> This all is mostly base on a script that was posted to glibc-alpha list
> by Jack How
> Oh, probably. Make it use a target of i686-linux and see what happens?
Sorry about the stupid question: But how? I'm using dpkg-buildpackage,
so...
Also - should I use --with-tls or not?
johannes
--
http://www.sipsolutions.de/
GnuPG key: http://www.sipsolutions.de/keys/JohannesBerg.asc
Key
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:14:52PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > That should do it. Check in the configure output in your build
> > directory - was the --enable-kernel used?
>
> Yes.
> $ /home/johannes/tmp/glibc/glibc-2.3.1/glibc-2.3.1/configure
> --host=i386-linux --build=i386-linux --prefix
> That should do it. Check in the configure output in your build
> directory - was the --enable-kernel used?
Yes.
$ /home/johannes/tmp/glibc/glibc-2.3.1/glibc-2.3.1/configure
--host=i386-linux --build=i386-linux --prefix=/usr --without-cvs
--enable-add-ons=linuxthreads
--with-headers=/usr/src/k
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-12
Severity: normal
If the directory /etc/rcS.d does not exists,
the postinst fails.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux oneiros 2.4.20-k7 #1 Tue Jan 14 00:29:06 EST 2003 i686 unknown
unknown GNU/Linux
Versions of the packag
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 07:58:54PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > This is not an answer to Johannes' question. FLOATING_STACKS is only
> > enabled on i386 if you specify an --enable-kernel of at least 2.3.99;
> > that loses kernel 2.2 compatibility. Debian can't do that.
>
> Understood.
> Next
> This is not an answer to Johannes' question. FLOATING_STACKS is only
> enabled on i386 if you specify an --enable-kernel of at least 2.3.99;
> that loses kernel 2.2 compatibility. Debian can't do that.
Understood.
Next question: How do I build my own package? I tried downloading the
package so
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
als Reiseveranstalter in der Türkei, mit Sitz in Deutschland, suchen wir neue
Kooperationspartner.
Unsere Partner sollten eigene Reisegruppen organisieren oder die Angebote von
DIADEMTRAVEL (Flüge, Hotels, Rundreisen, Badeurlaub, Sudienreisen, Bildungsreisen,
Chr
Your message dated Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:03:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#181556: fixed in glibc 2.3.1-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:03:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#181551: fixed in glibc 2.3.1-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:03:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#181556: fixed in glibc 2.3.1-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:17:49AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
[..snip..]
> Curious, how did you construct the list of symbols for each arch?
This all is mostly base on a script that was posted to glibc-alpha list
by Jack Howarth:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2002-09/msg00164.html
I
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.3.1-12
> Severity: important
>
> the postinst script makes a hackish test for file-rc which breaks with
> latest file-rc (0.7). rather use update-rc.d all the time so it doesn't
> break again
The problem with this is, that
Your message dated Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:35:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#181591: libc6: /etc/init.d/devpts.sh has an error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:34:28 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#181541: libc6: devpts.sh fails due to bad quoting
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Wed Feb 19 08:20:32 MST 2003
Log Message:
fix more for debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst and
debian/libc/etc/init.d/devpts.sh
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Repository: glibc-package/debian/libc/DEBIAN
who:gotom
time: Wed Feb 19 08:20:32 MST 2003
Log Message:
fix more for debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst and
debian/libc/etc/init.d/devpts.sh
Files:
changed:postinst
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Repository: glibc-package/debian/libc/etc/init.d
who:gotom
time: Wed Feb 19 08:20:32 MST 2003
Log Message:
fix more for debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst and
debian/libc/etc/init.d/devpts.sh
Files:
changed:devpts.sh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
> FWIW I have a list of candidates for compat symbols up now at:
> http://honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de/linux-mips/glibc/compat-symbols/
> I skipped ppc since this should be handeld upstream.
> Regards,
> -- Guido
Curious, how did you construct the list of symbols for each arch?
c.
--
To UNSUB
At Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:13:13 +0100,
Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 08:30:03PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > Cool! Is it difficult to make patches for plus 6 archs (except for
> > i386, sparc, and mips) soon?
> *Soon* is the keyword here. I won't get around to anything like this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 181556 grave
Bug#181556: /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.postinst: line 53: cd: /etc/rcS.d: No such file
or directory
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 181556 181606
Bug#181556: /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.postinst: line 53: cd: /etc/rcS.d: No such file
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 181493 serious
Bug#181493: glibc: Sun RPC code is non-free
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 08:30:03PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Cool! Is it difficult to make patches for plus 6 archs (except for
> i386, sparc, and mips) soon?
*Soon* is the keyword here. I won't get around to anything like this
during this week. Additionally there are some symbols which might
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-12
Severity: grave
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.postinst: line 53: cd: /etc/rcS.d: No such file
or directory
True, because I use file-rc scripts.
--
Piotr Roszatycki, Netia Telekom S.A..''`.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :
mailto:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 07:31:54PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> I heard Carlos is preparing compat-hppa, but he said
> he works it another day. So, only for extracting sarge,
FWIW I have a list of candidates for compat symbols up now at:
http://honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de/linux-mips/glibc/
At Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:17:49 +0100,
Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 07:31:54PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > I heard Carlos is preparing compat-hppa, but he said
> > he works it another day. So, only for extracting sarge,
> FWIW I have a list of candidates for compat symbols up
At Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:59:50 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> I put packages 2.3.1-12 for i386 at
>
> http://www.debian.org/~gotom/
>
> It fixes almost RC bugs except for license issue.
> No one objects, I dupload it.
Err, -12 postinst breaks with the latest file-rc.
I put packages 2.3.1-13 f
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-11
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The System gives /etc/init.d/rcS: line 17: [: =: unary operator expected
on startup.
this is because a bug in /etc/init.d/devpts.sh
The following patch will fix this.
---Patch---
--- /tmp/devpts.sh 2003-02-19 10:29:55.0
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 06:33:05PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > close 146489
> Bug#146489: libc6: PPC ld.so: missing icache flushes cause occasionnal SEGV's
> 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
> B
31 matches
Mail list logo
