Hi.
Just a short note to indicate my installation of the latest libc6 test
releases. The latest build seems to be working fine and things on my
machine are running smoothly, though the two oddities I spotted when
running the previous test release are still there. Regardless, the new
test release
At Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:16:45 +0200,
Guido Guenther wrote:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:01:49PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:48:53 +0200,
Guido Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 03:34:09PM -0700, solo turn wrote:
At Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:31:53 -0500,
Art Haas wrote:
Just a short note to indicate my installation of the latest libc6 test
releases. The latest build seems to be working fine and things on my
machine are running smoothly, though the two oddities I spotted when
running the previous test release
At 26 Jun 2003 00:16:57 +0200,
Karsten Ohme wrote:
I get this message (by looking at the output of strace) when I run an
application:
open(/usr/lib/locale/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/LC_MEASUREMENT, O_RDONLY)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
But this directory is valid and the file also. I
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Wed Jul 9 18:54:28 MDT 2003
Log Message:
version: nptl 0.52.
debian/changelog: add #200386.
Repository: glibc-package
who:gotom
time: Wed Jul 9 18:54:28 MDT 2003
Log Message:
version: nptl 0.52.
debian/changelog: add #200386.
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches
who:gotom
time: Wed Jul 9 18:54:29 MDT 2003
Log Message:
version: nptl 0.52.
debian/changelog: add #200386.
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* mips/mipsel:no machine to build. Guido, please check.
There are some debian mips/el machines now. casals and williams
maybe? I can't remember and db.d.o is still dead.
Matthias, could you tell me that --enable-sjlj-exception is really
Your message dated Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:47:38 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#198720: solved
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
At Thu, 10 Jul 2003 02:12:35 +0100,
James Troup wrote:
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* mips/mipsel: no machine to build. Guido, please check.
There are some debian mips/el machines now. casals and williams
maybe?
I don't know williams, but I know casals. The problem is
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-16
Severity: normal
All above timezone are using wrong time zone name
Asia/Jakarta UTC+7 WIB not WIT
Asia/Pontianak UTC+7 WIB not WIT
Asia/Makassar UTC+8 WITA not CIT
Asia/Ujung_Pandang UTC+8 WITA not CIT
Asia/Jayapura UTC+9 WIT not EIT
Please
Hi.
Just a short note to indicate my installation of the latest libc6 test
releases. The latest build seems to be working fine and things on my
machine are running smoothly, though the two oddities I spotted when
running the previous test release are still there. Regardless, the new
test release
At Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:16:45 +0200,
Guido Guenther wrote:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:01:49PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:48:53 +0200,
Guido Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 03:34:09PM -0700, solo turn wrote:
At 26 Jun 2003 00:16:57 +0200,
Karsten Ohme wrote:
I get this message (by looking at the output of strace) when I run an
application:
open(/usr/lib/locale/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/LC_MEASUREMENT, O_RDONLY)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
But this directory is valid and the file also. I
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Wed Jul 9 18:54:28 MDT 2003
Log Message:
version: nptl 0.52.
debian/changelog: add #200386.
Repository: glibc-package
who:gotom
time: Wed Jul 9 18:54:28 MDT 2003
Log Message:
version: nptl 0.52.
debian/changelog: add #200386.
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* mips/mipsel:no machine to build. Guido, please check.
There are some debian mips/el machines now. casals and williams
maybe? I can't remember and db.d.o is still dead.
Matthias, could you tell me that --enable-sjlj-exception is really
17 matches
Mail list logo