Re: glibc 2.3.2 intermediate status of the compilation (not test) on all archs

2003-07-24 Thread Carlos O'Donell
> Bah. Since you're the pretty much the most active glibc-hppa porter, > I'd do pretty much whatever you suggested for that port. That's like > suggesting that because drepper's not a DD we shouldn't follow his > advice. =) And if it weren't for me begging you to make glibc on HPPA > work, I'd b

Processed: Re: Bug#202722: sed: replace result is wrong

2003-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 202722 libc6 Bug#202722: sed: replace result is wrong Bug reassigned from package `sed' to `libc6'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Bug#202722: sed: replace result is wrong

2003-07-24 Thread Lenar Lõhmus
Now reassigned I provide some more maybe relevant information. Attached is my /etc/localge.gen and system locale is set to et_EE. # This file lists locales that you wish to have built. You can find a list # of valid supported locales at /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED. Other # combinations are possible

Re: glibc 2.3.2 intermediate status of the compilation (not test) on all archs

2003-07-24 Thread Carlos O'Donell
> Bah. Since you're the pretty much the most active glibc-hppa porter, > I'd do pretty much whatever you suggested for that port. That's like > suggesting that because drepper's not a DD we shouldn't follow his > advice. =) And if it weren't for me begging you to make glibc on HPPA > work, I'd b

Processed: Re: Bug#202722: sed: replace result is wrong

2003-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 202722 libc6 Bug#202722: sed: replace result is wrong Bug reassigned from package `sed' to `libc6'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Bug#202722: sed: replace result is wrong

2003-07-24 Thread Lenar Lõhmus
Now reassigned I provide some more maybe relevant information. Attached is my /etc/localge.gen and system locale is set to et_EE. # This file lists locales that you wish to have built. You can find a list # of valid supported locales at /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED. Other # combinations are possible

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey

2003-07-24 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Thu Jul 24 08:17:31 MDT 2003 Log Message: * Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - debian/packages.d/s390x.mk: Remove gcc-3.2 hardcode Files: changed:changelog

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/packages.d by jbailey

2003-07-24 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian/packages.d who:jbailey time: Thu Jul 24 08:17:31 MDT 2003 Log Message: * Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - debian/packages.d/s390x.mk: Remove gcc-3.2 hardcode Files: changed:s390x.mk

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey

2003-07-24 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Thu Jul 24 08:17:31 MDT 2003 Log Message: * Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - debian/packages.d/s390x.mk: Remove gcc-3.2 hardcode Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/packages.d by jbailey

2003-07-24 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian/packages.d who:jbailey time: Thu Jul 24 08:17:31 MDT 2003 Log Message: * Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - debian/packages.d/s390x.mk: Remove gcc-3.2 hardcode Files: changed:s390x.mk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Re: glibc 2.3.2 intermediate status of the compilation (not test) on all archs

2003-07-24 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 00:57, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > > Since debian doesn't check the test-suite results for install (e.g. we > > > aren't at a zero error in make check poilcy), it would be suicide to > > > install said glibc build :) > > Gee Carlos, if you ask nicely we could inflict that on

Re: glibc 2.3.2 intermediate status of the compilation (not test)on all archs

2003-07-24 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 00:57, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > > Since debian doesn't check the test-suite results for install (e.g. we > > > aren't at a zero error in make check poilcy), it would be suicide to > > > install said glibc build :) > > Gee Carlos, if you ask nicely we could inflict that on

Bug#202374: marked as done (localedef segfaults when generating locales second time)

2003-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:47:05 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#202374: localedef segfaults when generating locales second time has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#202374: marked as done (localedef segfaults when generating locales second time)

2003-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:47:05 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#202374: localedef segfaults when generating locales second time has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Re: glibc 2.3.2 intermediate status of the compilation (not test) on all archs

2003-07-24 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:42:49PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 04:09:34PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > > Since debian doesn't check the test-suite results for install (e.g. we > > aren't at a zero error in make check poilcy), it would be suicide to > > install said gli