On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:48:29PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Ah, so in general, when people find a flagrant DFSG violation in main,
> the best thing they can do is just leave it alone. Otherwise, it's a
> "change", and past inclusion is always sufficient present for future
> retention.
No,
[Mailing Debian glibc package maintainers and Debian Release Manager in
their official capacities. My apolgies for the duplicate for those of
you who are also subscribed to debian-legal, which is CCed.]
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 05:17:28PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
[...]
> No, the burden of proof
reassign 100986 libc6-dev,manpages-dev
thanks
All bugs related to libc function calls belong to manpages-dev. The
original bug is related to a *binary* shipped with libc6-dev, so it
belongs to libc6-dev.
T
--
Computers aren't intelligent; they only think they are.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 100986 libc6-dev,manpages-dev
Bug#100986: Missing man pages
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `libc6-dev,manpages-dev'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
clone 100986 -1
reassign 100986 libc6-dev
reassign -1 manpages-dev
retitle 100986 no manpage for /usr/bin/gencat
retitle -1 missing manpages for some library functions
severity -1 wishlist
thanks
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 16:21, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> reassign 100986 libc6-dev,manpages-dev
> thanks
>
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 100986 -1
Bug#100986: Missing man pages
Bug 100986 cloned as bug 208856.
> reassign 100986 libc6-dev
Bug#100986: Missing man pages
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev,manpages-dev' to `libc6-dev'.
> reassign -1 manpages-dev
Bug#208856: Missin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 202756 + help
Bug#202756: glibc 2.3.2 breaks rpc.mountd (nfs-kernel-server)
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: help
> tags 205099 + help
Bug#205099: libc6: syslog makes cgi process hang after openlog() followed by syslog()
There were no tags set.
Bu
Greetings, and thankyou for this suggestion. It does seem like a bit
of a hack though, no? Do you feel this would be more stable than just
linking statically?
Apropos to this, I just saw the following warnings issued on a static
build on merulo:
/usr/lib/libtcl8.4.a(tclUnixFCmd.o)(.text+0x1b6
> On 05 Sep 2003 18:38:45 -0400, Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Camm> Greetings, and thankyou for this suggestion. It does seem like a bit
Camm> of a hack though, no?
It's a hack until it's used > 3 times, then it becomes a
technique... ;-)
Camm> Do you feel this would be more
9 matches
Mail list logo
