On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 06:29:39PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:38:09AM +0100, Christophe Rhodes wrote:
> > Package: libc6-dev
> > Version: 2.3.1-17
> > Severity: important
> >
> > This isn't about the platform or version of libc6-dev generated by
> > reportbug, so
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-4
Severity: normal
We currently have two programs in base, tzconfig and tzsetup, that do
the same things. I thought I asked for this a long time ago, but I think
tzconfig should be removed from the distribution. If there is a lot of
documentation that refers to tzconf
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If POSIXLY_CORRECT is set, localedef switches its mode to verbose (so it's
> equivalent to -v option). If it's verbose mode, warning messages shows. And
> it returns !0 value.
Well, doesn't that sound like a bug? Does POSIX require all these warnings a
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2-6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
as explained by Joey Hess in #209279, if /etc/environment already
contains a LANG= line, it won't be removed if None was selected
in the locales/default_environment_locale question.
Here is a patch; as I proposed a patch against d
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2-6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
some people argued in #209279 that setting LANG=C in /etc/environment
does not make much sense (and also that it currently has some bad
influence on d-i).
Here is a patch to not display this locale in the
locales/default_environme
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:38:09AM +0100, Christophe Rhodes wrote:
> Package: libc6-dev
> Version: 2.3.1-17
> Severity: important
>
> This isn't about the platform or version of libc6-dev generated by
> reportbug, sorry, but about 2.3.2 on ppc.
>
> The definition of ucontext_t and mcontext_t cha
Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 01:47:25PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > > So I'm not sure if it should be reassigned, or just closed. The
> > > problem is hidden with the two fixes, and the last real is probably
> > > already reported against slang. Th
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-6
Severity: important
pthread_cond_timedwait.dpatch contains this chunk
--- libc/linuxthreads/sysdeps/pthread/pthread-functions.h.jj 2003-04-20
03:37:06.0 -0400
+++ libc/linuxthreads/sysdeps/pthread/pthread-functions.h 2003-09-01
05:35:34.0 -
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 20:55, Denis Barbier wrote:
> The locales/default_environment_locale question asks whether a locale
> should be the default for the whole system. If answer is None,
> /etc/environment is untouched, otherwise LANG=$locale is added into
> this file. Are there suggestions to ma
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 01:47:25PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > So I'm not sure if it should be reassigned, or just closed. The
> > problem is hidden with the two fixes, and the last real is probably
> > already reported against slang. The behaviour of the locales pack
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> So I'm not sure if it should be reassigned, or just closed. The
> problem is hidden with the two fixes, and the last real is probably
> already reported against slang. The behaviour of the locales package
> is not obviously a bug, so I am reluctant to report it.
I be
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 17:28, Steve Doerr wrote:
> Any ideas on how I can get more info, or get around this?
You could try adding "set -x" to the script and invoking it by hand.
p.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2-6
locales in the unstable distro won't seem to configure for me, but the
error doesn't offer anything as to what it's failing on. I tried to
move locale.gen out of the way, but it doesn't make a difference.
The error:
bash-2.03# mv locale.gen locale.gen.old
bash-
On 2003-09-10 11:17:25 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:10:25PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > I agree, but then, why not accept "ISO-8859-1" only, from the user's
> > point of view?
>
> You might as well just leave it at C. It doesn't provide the case
> conversion functi
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Wed Sep 10 05:34:14 MDT 2003
Log Message:
start 2.3.2-7, and move some changes which is not reflected in 2.3.2-6.
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
Hi,
It's a possibility that the pthread fix in glibc 2.3.2-6 has sorted out
these syslog() bugs too, which both appear to be SMP/threading issues.
Could you please retest with that version?
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:10:25PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2003-09-10 10:58:10 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 06:27:01PM +0900, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > But case conversion rules should apply to the language of the
> > > corresponding text, which isn't necessa
On 2003-09-10 10:58:10 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 06:27:01PM +0900, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > But case conversion rules should apply to the language of the
> > corresponding text, which isn't necessarily the same as the
> > language chosen by the user (with LC_CTYPE).
>
Your message dated Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:45:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#209402: locales: Setting LC_CTYPE to ISO-8859-1 does not work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 06:27:01PM +0900, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:07:03 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > The LC_CTYPE variable sets the character classification and case
> > conversion rules. Picking an encoding is just one part of this: things
> > like case conversion rul
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:07:03 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 11:07:38PM +0200, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> > Colin Watson wrote:
> > >Try 'LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.ISO-8859-1' instead. You need the language and
> > >country parts there.
> >
> > That works. However I wonder: why do I nee
21 matches
Mail list logo
