On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:16:36PM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:51:42AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > I would suggest touching a net/sock.h. The stuff inside it
> > > isn't very important at all to user-space processes. See what I have
> > > done for libdumbnet 1
ГЛОБАЛЬНАЯ СЕЗОННАЯ РАСПРОДАЖА
В связи с завершением сезона 2003 группа компаний МОРЕМАН объявляет ГЛОБАЛЬНОЕ СНИЖЕНИЕ ЦЕН на ряд товаров 2003 модельного года для спорта и отдыха на воде!!!
Подвесные двигатели Johnson и Evinrude (США) скидка до 20%
Масло StarBrite TC-W3 (США) скидка более 50%
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:17:48AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: libc6-i686
> Version: 2.3.2.ds1-3
> Severity: normal
> Tags: experimental
>
>
> Hi,
>
> here is the problem:
>
> # oooprelink -f
> Prelinking OpenOffice.org binaries... /usr/sbin/prelink:
> /lib/i686/libc-2.3.2.so ha
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:16:36PM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:51:42AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > I would suggest touching a net/sock.h. The stuff inside it
> > > isn't very important at all to user-space processes. See what I have
> > > done for libdumbnet 1
Repository: glibc-package/debian/sysdeps
who:jbailey
time: Wed Oct 8 11:54:13 MDT 2003
Log Message:
List which archs we've tested and not tested, add some notes to TODO. Define
a proper sysdeps/sparc.mk file that does v9 and sparc64.
Files:
changed:Tag: nptl sparc.mk
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:jbailey
time: Wed Oct 8 11:54:13 MDT 2003
Log Message:
List which archs we've tested and not tested, add some notes to TODO. Define
a proper sysdeps/sparc.mk file that does v9 and sparc64.
Files:
changed:Tag: nptl TODO
ГЛОБАЛЬНАЯ СЕЗОННАЯ РАСПРОДАЖА
В связи с завершением сезона 2003 группа компаний МОРЕМАН объявляет ГЛОБАЛЬНОЕ СНИЖЕНИЕ ЦЕН на ряд товаров 2003 модельного года для спорта и отдыха на воде!!!
Подвесные двигатели Johnson и Evinrude (США) скидка до 20%
Масло StarBrite TC-W3 (США) скидка более 50%
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:17:48AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: libc6-i686
> Version: 2.3.2.ds1-3
> Severity: normal
> Tags: experimental
>
>
> Hi,
>
> here is the problem:
>
> # oooprelink -f
> Prelinking OpenOffice.org binaries... /usr/sbin/prelink: /lib/i686/libc-2.3.2.so has
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:51:42AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > I would suggest touching a net/sock.h. The stuff inside it
> > isn't very important at all to user-space processes. See what I have
> > done for libdumbnet 1.7.
>
> Absolutely not. Stop using instead.
What woul
Repository: glibc-package/debian/sysdeps
who:jbailey
time: Wed Oct 8 11:54:13 MDT 2003
Log Message:
List which archs we've tested and not tested, add some notes to TODO. Define a
proper sysdeps/sparc.mk file that does v9 and sparc64.
Files:
changed:Tag: nptl sparc.mk
--
T
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:jbailey
time: Wed Oct 8 11:54:13 MDT 2003
Log Message:
List which archs we've tested and not tested, add some notes to TODO. Define a
proper sysdeps/sparc.mk file that does v9 and sparc64.
Files:
changed:Tag: nptl TODO
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:20:45AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
> > I have problems because of this missing file... I'm trying to package a
> > new version of libdnet (libdumbnet in debian) and the build process
> > quits after spitting out a message that 'net/sock.h' cannot be found.
> >
> > What sh
Virus detected in this email! One or more attachment(s) was infected. Below are the actions taken:The following attachment(s) was infected and has been cleaned and attached herein:Attachment name:Nil.
---The following attachment(s) was
> I have problems because of this missing file... I'm trying to package a
> new version of libdnet (libdumbnet in debian) and the build process
> quits after spitting out a message that 'net/sock.h' cannot be found.
>
> What should be done about this?
I would suggest touching a net/sock
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:51:42AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > I would suggest touching a net/sock.h. The stuff inside it
> > isn't very important at all to user-space processes. See what I have
> > done for libdumbnet 1.7.
>
> Absolutely not. Stop using instead.
What woul
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:20:45AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
> > I have problems because of this missing file... I'm trying to package a
> > new version of libdnet (libdumbnet in debian) and the build process
> > quits after spitting out a message that 'net/sock.h' cannot be found.
> >
> > What sh
Virus detected in this email! One or more attachment(s) was infected. Below are the actions taken:The following attachment(s) was infected and has been cleaned and attached herein:Attachment name:Nil.
---The following attachment(s) was
> I have problems because of this missing file... I'm trying to package a
> new version of libdnet (libdumbnet in debian) and the build process
> quits after spitting out a message that 'net/sock.h' cannot be found.
>
> What should be done about this?
I would suggest touching a net/sock
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) writes:
> I am not sure what you mean by "user-defined locales", since your
> patch does not check UID.
I meant locales that are generated by a user. In this particular
case, it's a POSIX-conformance-test shell script that generates
the locales.
> As autobuilde
Package: libc6-i686
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
Hi,
here is the problem:
# oooprelink -f
Prelinking OpenOffice.org binaries... /usr/sbin/prelink:
/lib/i686/libc-2.3.2.so has dependency cycle
And indeed there is dependency cycle between those 2 libraries:
/lib/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 214692 g++-3.3
Bug#214692: libc6-dev: stdlib.h internal #includes broken/point to
moved/non-existent headers
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `g++-3.3'.
> reassign 214694 g++-3.3
Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) writes:
> I am not sure what you mean by "user-defined locales", since your
> patch does not check UID.
I meant locales that are generated by a user. In this particular
case, it's a POSIX-conformance-test shell script that generates
the locales.
> As autobuilde
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 05:33:21PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.3.2-8
[...]
> In the meantime, to conform to LSB 1.3, I propose that we modify the
> "localedef" command to refuse to create user-defined locales with
> multibyte encodings when invoked in a strict POSIX envi
Package: libc6-i686
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
Hi,
here is the problem:
# oooprelink -f
Prelinking OpenOffice.org binaries... /usr/sbin/prelink: /lib/i686/libc-2.3.2.so has
dependency cycle
And indeed there is dependency cycle between those 2 libraries:
/lib/
reassign 214692 g++-3.3
reassign 214694 g++-3.3
severity 214692 normal
severity 214694 normal
merge 214692 214694
retitle 214694 g++-3.3 (3.3.2) should depend on gcc-3.3 (>= 3.3.2)
thanks
xiphmont writes:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > tags 214694 +
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:50:38AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> reassign 214692 g++-3.3
> reassign 214694 g++-3.3
> severity 214692 normal
> severity 214694 normal
> merge 214692 214694
> retitle 214694 g++-3.3 (3.3.2) should depend on gcc-3.3 (>= 3.3.2)
> thanks
...is there any way to cause
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:29:03AM -0400, xiphmont wrote:
> I have more information to offer; it appears to be a version skew
> problem. Updating only gcc-3.3 and not g++-3.3 is what triggered the
> problem (g++ was expecting includes in the old location, gcc had
> removed/moved them). I'd have t
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> tags 214694 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> unable to reproduce. what is the contents of confdefs.h?
I have more information to offer; it appears to be a version skew
problem. Updating only gcc-3.3 and not g++-3.3 is what trigger
Your message dated Tue, 7 Oct 2003 21:52:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#214692: apologies, this a dependency problem in GCC, not a
bug in libc6-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
tags 214694 + unreproducible
thanks
unable to reproduce. what is the contents of confdefs.h?
xiphmont writes:
> Package: gcc-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre5
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I apologize for originally filing this against libc6-dev; I see
>
34 matches
Mail list logo
