Bug#219356: I also think libc6-i586 would be useful

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:21:16PM -0200, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote: > > libc6-i686 won't work in a K6. An libc6-i586 would be useful for using > NPTL on a i586 (if it works, I recall at least Gentoo's glibc didn't > compile NTPL in a i586. I recall seeing somewhere it needed a couple of > small

Re: remove my address from your mail lists

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#219356: I also think libc6-i586 would be useful

libc6-i686 won't work in a K6. An libc6-i586 would be useful for using NPTL on a i586 (if it works, I recall at least Gentoo's glibc didn't compile NTPL in a i586. I recall seeing somewhere it needed a couple of small patches to work). If NPTL works correctly in a 486, a libc6-i486 could be used

Bug#219356: libc6: i586 optimized libs

On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 23:35, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:29:04PM +0100, Emmanuel Fuste wrote: > > Package: libc6 > > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-9 > > Severity: wishlist > > Tags: experimental sid > > > > Pleease, include an optimized i586 lib package like for i686 > >

Bug#219356: libc6: i586 optimized libs

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:29:04PM +0100, Emmanuel Fuste wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-9 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: experimental sid > > Pleease, include an optimized i586 lib package like for i686 > in next release. My good hold dual pentium 233mmx computer will be ve

Bug#219356: libc6: i586 optimized libs

Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-9 Severity: wishlist Tags: experimental sid Pleease, include an optimized i586 lib package like for i686 in next release. My good hold dual pentium 233mmx computer will be very very thankful to you. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unst

Bug#219180: Forgot the file

Once again, I have forgotten the file. It can be downloaded from here: -- Brian M. Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x560553e7 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#205099: marked as done (libc6: syslog makes cgi process hang after openlog() followed by syslog())

Your message dated Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:32:44 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#205099: Please check these bugs with the latest glibc has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#211621: marked as done (libc6: upgrade causes lwres-related breakage; sshd hangs trying to login)

Your message dated Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:32:44 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#205099: Please check these bugs with the latest glibc has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#218642: marked as done (locales: Please update Dutch translation)

Your message dated Wed, 05 Nov 2003 13:18:51 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#218642: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#219176: marked as done (libc6.1: Fails to install on ia64 because of libc in ia32-libs)

Your message dated Wed, 05 Nov 2003 13:18:51 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#219176: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#218449: marked as done (libc6: refuses upgrade if libc5 or libc4 (a.out) installed)

Your message dated Wed, 05 Nov 2003 13:18:50 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#218449: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#219271: marked as done (libc6 - statvfs broken)

Your message dated Wed, 05 Nov 2003 13:18:51 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#219271: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#218645: marked as done (glibc 2.3.2.ds1-8 on ia64, query_module() not implemented)

Your message dated Wed, 05 Nov 2003 13:18:51 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#218645: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#205234: marked as done (libc6: vsyslog() call hangs su and login)

Your message dated Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:32:44 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#205099: Please check these bugs with the latest glibc has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#219025: marked as done (libc6 upgrade broke ldconfig)

Your message dated Wed, 05 Nov 2003 13:18:51 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#219025: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#218595: marked as done (glibc: FTBFS with make 3.79.1-14)

Your message dated Wed, 05 Nov 2003 13:18:51 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#218595: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#205099: Please check these bugs with the latest glibc

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 06:56:11PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > > Hmm... so could you confirm that this bug is already fixed? These 3 > > bugs are marked as "grave", so we have to resolve ASAP. And the > > trouble is debian-glibc maintainers can't reproduce the reoccurrence > > of these bug

glibc_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-10_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-10_all.deb glibc_2.3.2.ds1-10.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-10.diff.gz glibc_2.3.2.ds1-10.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-10.dsc libc-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/l

Bug#205099: Please check these bugs with the latest glibc

GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:30:36 -0500, > Anthony DeRobertis wrote: >> On Nov 3, 2003, at 10:16, GOTO Masanori wrote: >> >>> Bug#205099, #205234, and #211621 have sit as Grave bug for 2 or 3 >>> months - but at last any developers can't reproduce this problem

Bug#218516: marked as done (linux-kernel-headers: Check for symbolic link before installing)

Your message dated Wed, 05 Nov 2003 11:32:22 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#218516: fixed in linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7-bk-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#219175: marked as done (linux-kernel-headers: fs.h doesn't compile when included from userspace)

Your message dated Wed, 05 Nov 2003 11:32:23 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#219175: fixed in linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7-bk-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#218516: linux-kernel-headers: Check for symbolic link before installing

Eric Valette wrote: Because Sarge supports NPTL when using 2.6 kernels, and that requires 2.6 headers to be useful. A number of other applications can take advantage of 2.6 features there now. NPTL is fine mostly for servers. But I guess a number of user mode driver for average people will als

Bug#218516: linux-kernel-headers: Check for symbolic link before installing

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 05:52:20PM +0100, Eric Valette wrote: > Eric Valette wrote: > > >>Because Sarge supports NPTL when using 2.6 kernels, and that requires > >>2.6 headers to be useful. A number of other applications can take > >>advantage of 2.6 features there now. > > > > > >NPTL is fine mo

linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-8_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-8.diff.gz to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-headers/linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-8.diff.gz linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-8.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-headers/linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-8.dsc linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey

Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Wed Nov 5 08:55:45 MST 2003 Log Message: - debian/patches/90_glibc232-statvfs.dpatch: Don't get confused on bad mtab. (Closes: #219271) - debian/patches/90_glibc232-timezones.dpatch: Update timezone informati

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by jbailey

Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:jbailey time: Wed Nov 5 08:55:45 MST 2003 Log Message: - debian/patches/90_glibc232-statvfs.dpatch: Don't get confused on bad mtab. (Closes: #219271) - debian/patches/90_glibc232-timezones.dpatch: Update timezone i

cvs commit to linux-kernel-headers/debian/patches by dan

Repository: linux-kernel-headers/debian/patches who:dan time: Wed Nov 5 08:03:31 MST 2003 Log Message: - debian/linux-kernel-headers.preinst: Check for asm-generic symlink (Closes: #218516). - debian/patches/linux-unistd-errno.patch: Don't say "extern int errno"

cvs commit to linux-kernel-headers/debian by dan

Repository: linux-kernel-headers/debian who:dan time: Wed Nov 5 08:03:31 MST 2003 Log Message: - debian/linux-kernel-headers.preinst: Check for asm-generic symlink (Closes: #218516). - debian/patches/linux-unistd-errno.patch: Don't say "extern int errno" i

Bug#204789: [Gcl-devel] Re: ia64 function descriptors and unexec

Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When I first read this, I was more confused by the meaning of the term > 'local' and what I've been seeing. Which is understandable, because I was confused, too. What you are saying is correct. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#211621: Please check these bugs with the latest glibc

Hi Anthony! At Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:30:36 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > On Nov 3, 2003, at 10:16, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > Bug#205099, #205234, and #211621 have sit as Grave bug for 2 or 3 > > months - but at last any developers can't reproduce this problem. > > FYI, I'm only in the bug bec

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in by dan

Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in who:dan time: Wed Nov 5 07:11:29 MST 2003 Log Message: - debian/debhelper.in/libc.preinst: Ignore ia32-libs also (Closes: #219176). - debian/control.in/main: Build depend on fixed linux-kernel-headers to get ia

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/control.in by dan

Repository: glibc-package/debian/control.in who:dan time: Wed Nov 5 07:11:29 MST 2003 Log Message: - debian/debhelper.in/libc.preinst: Ignore ia32-libs also (Closes: #219176). - debian/control.in/main: Build depend on fixed linux-kernel-headers to get ia64

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by dan

Repository: glibc-package/debian who:dan time: Wed Nov 5 07:11:29 MST 2003 Log Message: - debian/debhelper.in/libc.preinst: Ignore ia32-libs also (Closes: #219176). - debian/control.in/main: Build depend on fixed linux-kernel-headers to get ia64 module sys

Bug#219176: libc6.1: Fails to install on ia64 because of libc in ia32-libs

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:53:30PM -0700, Eric Schwartz wrote: > Package: libc6.1 > Version: 2.3.2-9 > Severity: grave > Tags: sid > > I tried a dist-upgrade today: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libc6.1-dev: Depends: libc6.1 (= 2.3.2.ds1-9) but 2.3.2-9 is installed > loca

Bug#219205: libc6: Need update to libpthread locking code

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:46:36PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:21:57AM +, James Troup wrote: > > Mike Fedyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Package: libc6 > > > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-9 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > The change mentioned at [1]doesn't seem to ha

Bug#219271: libc6 - statvfs broken

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 05:20:48AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 01:48:37PM +0100, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote: > > > The .ds1 versions of libc6 broke something, presumably in statvfs(). > > Upstream CVS has the following: > > 2003-10-26 Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Bug#219271: libc6 - statvfs broken

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 01:48:37PM +0100, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote: > The .ds1 versions of libc6 broke something, presumably in statvfs(). Upstream CVS has the following: 2003-10-26 Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/internal_statvfs.c (__internal_statvfs):

Bug#219271: libc6 - statvfs broken

Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-9 Tags: sid Hi, The .ds1 versions of libc6 broke something, presumably in statvfs(). I have a remote (stable, 2.4.something) system with an unstable chroot on it. Inside that chroot only a nfs share is mounted, nothing else. Up to last week all worked fine; howe

Re: Reopening #218561 (libc6 relocation error)?

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:56:57AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:22:26PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/epstool-3.02$ grep -r errno . > > ./src/epstool.c:#include > > ./src/epstool.c:fprintf(stderr, "Failed to fork, error=%d\n", errno); >

Re: Reopening #218561 (libc6 relocation error)?

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:22:26PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > I'm tempted to reopen this bug because it still breaks software even > without using 'extern int errno'. > > I received a grave bug #219103 against epstool 3.02-3 yesterday, > epstool failed with the current glibc because of this errno

Reopening #218561 (libc6 relocation error)?

Hi glibc maintainers! I'm tempted to reopen this bug because it still breaks software even without using 'extern int errno'. I received a grave bug #219103 against epstool 3.02-3 yesterday, epstool failed with the current glibc because of this errno relocation issue. But grepping the source tree

Bug#205328: libc6: mathematica segfaults, too

Dear Meik, Thank you very much for the Mathematica workaround! It worked fine for me, after I had located the package libc6_2.3.1-16_i386.deb at http://ftp.pop-ce.rnp.br/pub/linux/debian/pool/main/g/glibc/ since the apt-get command gave me the new libc6-2.3.2; I just wondered whether there is a