Hi ...I have built a shared library on Red
hat 6.2 using gcc 2.95.2 (with -lpthread option on) [glibc version: 2.1.3] and I
am trying to run it on RHEL 3.0 [glibc version: 2.3.2]. I am facing the
following problem while trying to load that shared library.I get the
following error :symbol __
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jan 2004 21:05:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Hi
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bu
This link can change your life
clic this link below
>> http://pharm56fr.com/host/default.asp?id=az <
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jan 2004 21:05:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Hi
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bu
This patch was commited to the glibc CVS 2003-11-04. A newer version
of the glibc source should include the fix.
This patch was commited to the glibc CVS 2003-11-04. A newer version
of the glibc source should include the fix.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 07:00:09PM +0100, Simone Piccardi wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 04:23, Colin Watson wrote:
> > This definitely implies to me that you need to define _XOPEN_SOURCE
> > (__USE_XOPEN may have the same effect but it's supposed to be set by
> > , not the user) in order to get th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 208238 + patch
Bug#208238: locales: wrong charset for et_EE
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
tags 208238 + patch
thanks
[Indrek Hein]
> Yes, Meelis Roos is absolutely correct. As soon as ISO 8859-15
> became official, Estonian locale data switched over to it. Solaris
> and the BSD family have already followed the suit. You seem to have
> the correct pointer to the recent standard web pag
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 07:00:09PM +0100, Simone Piccardi wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 04:23, Colin Watson wrote:
> > This definitely implies to me that you need to define _XOPEN_SOURCE
> > (__USE_XOPEN may have the same effect but it's supposed to be set by
> > , not the user) in order to get th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 208238 + patch
Bug#208238: locales: wrong charset for et_EE
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
tags 208238 + patch
thanks
[Indrek Hein]
> Yes, Meelis Roos is absolutely correct. As soon as ISO 8859-15
> became official, Estonian locale data switched over to it. Solaris
> and the BSD family have already followed the suit. You seem to have
> the correct pointer to the recent standard web pag
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 01:16:06AM +0100, Simone Piccardi wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 04:23, Colin Watson wrote:
> > This definitely implies to me that you need to define _XOPEN_SOURCE
> > (__USE_XOPEN may have the same effect but it's supposed to be set by
> > , not the user) in order to get th
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 04:23, Colin Watson wrote:
> This definitely implies to me that you need to define _XOPEN_SOURCE
> (__USE_XOPEN may have the same effect but it's supposed to be set by
> , not the user) in order to get this constant. See 'info
> libc "Feature Test Macros"' for information on t
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 01:16:06AM +0100, Simone Piccardi wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 04:23, Colin Watson wrote:
> > This definitely implies to me that you need to define _XOPEN_SOURCE
> > (__USE_XOPEN may have the same effect but it's supposed to be set by
> > , not the user) in order to get th
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jan 2004 02:33:26 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225304: libc6-dev: OPEN_MAX undeclared after using limits.h
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 04:23, Colin Watson wrote:
> This definitely implies to me that you need to define _XOPEN_SOURCE
> (__USE_XOPEN may have the same effect but it's supposed to be set by
> , not the user) in order to get this constant. See 'info
> libc "Feature Test Macros"' for information on t
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jan 2004 19:05:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225300: libc6-dev: sys/poll.h do not define POLLRDNORM
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jan 2004 02:33:26 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225304: libc6-dev: OPEN_MAX undeclared after using limits.h
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jan 2004 19:05:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225300: libc6-dev: sys/poll.h do not define POLLRDNORM
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
At Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:13:45 -0500,
Jeff Bailey wrote:
> We were holding off a new cvs update until the Sarge release. That
> doesn't appear to be soon, since there are still buildds that are
> offline. Also, given drepper's reluctance to ever release a new
> version, and prediction of no major c
tags 222536 unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 18:24, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Can you try to build illuminator, and see if the problem occurs?
I ran a build of illuminator in the unstable chroot on smackdown (the
user chroot, not the buildd one) and it worked fine. So, I don't really
At Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:13:45 -0500,
Jeff Bailey wrote:
> We were holding off a new cvs update until the Sarge release. That
> doesn't appear to be soon, since there are still buildds that are
> offline. Also, given drepper's reluctance to ever release a new
> version, and prediction of no major c
tags 222536 unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 18:24, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Can you try to build illuminator, and see if the problem occurs?
I ran a build of illuminator in the unstable chroot on smackdown (the
user chroot, not the buildd one) and it worked fine. So, I don't really
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 06:46:50PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 04:59:48PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be much easier and less confusing to users to copy the
> > relevant headers into the packages that need them to build?
>
> Probably. But that's a politics dec
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please change the example to: [...]
Note that distributing a manual thus changed may require further
changes per section 4 of the GNU FDL, unless you have a separate
arrangement with the copyright holder.
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 06:46:50PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 04:59:48PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be much easier and less confusing to users to copy the
> > relevant headers into the packages that need them to build?
>
> Probably. But that's a politics dec
This link can change your life
clic this link below
>> http://pharm56fr.com/host/default.asp?id=az <<
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please change the example to: [...]
Note that distributing a manual thus changed may require further
changes per section 4 of the GNU FDL, unless you have a separate
arrangement with the copyright holder.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
This link can change your life
clic this link below
>> http://pharm56fr.com/host/default.asp?id=az <
30 matches
Mail list logo
