Bug#40263: improve your life guys

2004-02-22 Thread Chad Mcclendon
What a difference! After a couple months, I'm now over 7 inches and am much thicker than ever! I thank you and my girlfriend thanks you as well. http://www.itshtr.info/p1/?id=tek http://www.itshtr.info/oz.html

Bug#234139: libc doc vs manpages disagreement

2004-02-22 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:50:43 -0500, Marek Habersack wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:55:38PM +0100, Martin Schulze scribbled: > > Marek Habersack wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > I've just noticed that the two sources disagree on the units used for > > > the > > > RLIMIT_RSS resource. libc docs

Re: udev uploaded to experimental

2004-02-22 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:32:38 +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:43:50, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > I'm lazy, so I will include my last blog post as a summary. > > > > This goes to debian-glibc and the initscripts maintainer as well because > > S35mountkernfs needs to be spli

Bug#234139: libc doc vs manpages disagreement

2004-02-22 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:50:43 -0500, Marek Habersack wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:55:38PM +0100, Martin Schulze scribbled: > > Marek Habersack wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > I've just noticed that the two sources disagree on the units used for the > > > RLIMIT_RSS resource. libc docs claim

Re: udev uploaded to experimental

2004-02-22 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:32:38 +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:43:50, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > I'm lazy, so I will include my last blog post as a summary. > > > > This goes to debian-glibc and the initscripts maintainer as well because > > S35mountkernfs needs to be spli

Re: Why do we not require libgd?

2004-02-22 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 20:27, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I thought there was a reason involving licensing, but I can't find any hint > of it now. If we don't force LIBGD to no in configparms, we get the > memusage script and memusagestat binary, which are quite handy. I imagine > we'd need to crea

Bug#234272: linux-kernel-headers: missing include in /usr/include/asm/ipc.h

2004-02-22 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 Severity: normal Hi, on compiling valgrind-2.10 I get: if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./demangle -I../include -DVG_LIBDIR="\"/usr/local/lib"\" -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -O -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -g -

Re: Why do we not require libgd?

2004-02-22 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 20:27, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I thought there was a reason involving licensing, but I can't find any hint > of it now. If we don't force LIBGD to no in configparms, we get the > memusage script and memusagestat binary, which are quite handy. I imagine > we'd need to crea

Bug#234238: libc6: relocation error

2004-02-22 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:01:47PM -, Matthew Bates wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10 > > I am running woody with libc6 from unstable (I guess it has been > installed as a result of using some unstable backported apps). After > manually upgrading to kernel 2.6.3, it is not poss

Bug#234272: linux-kernel-headers: missing include in /usr/include/asm/ipc.h

2004-02-22 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 Severity: normal Hi, on compiling valgrind-2.10 I get: if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./demangle -I../include -DVG_LIBDIR="\"/usr/local/lib"\" -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -O -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -g -

Processed: Bug#234139 is a libc bug

2004-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 234139 libc6 Bug#234139: manpages-dev: RLIMIT_RSS description error in setrlimit(2) Bug reassigned from package `manpages-dev' to `libc6'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#234238: libc6: relocation error

2004-02-22 Thread Matthew Bates
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10 I am running woody with libc6 from unstable (I guess it has been installed as a result of using some unstable backported apps). After manually upgrading to kernel 2.6.3, it is not possible to run certain apps - namely, courier-authdaemon and exim4 (both rely

Bug#234238: libc6: relocation error

2004-02-22 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:01:47PM -, Matthew Bates wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10 > > I am running woody with libc6 from unstable (I guess it has been > installed as a result of using some unstable backported apps). After > manually upgrading to kernel 2.6.3, it is not poss

Processed: Bug#234139 is a libc bug

2004-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 234139 libc6 Bug#234139: manpages-dev: RLIMIT_RSS description error in setrlimit(2) Bug reassigned from package `manpages-dev' to `libc6'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#234238: libc6: relocation error

2004-02-22 Thread Matthew Bates
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10 I am running woody with libc6 from unstable (I guess it has been installed as a result of using some unstable backported apps). After manually upgrading to kernel 2.6.3, it is not possible to run certain apps - namely, courier-authdaemon and exim4 (both rely

Re: udev uploaded to experimental

2004-02-22 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:43:50, Marco d'Itri wrote: > I'm lazy, so I will include my last blog post as a summary. > > This goes to debian-glibc and the initscripts maintainer as well because > S35mountkernfs needs to be split in two parts: one which will mount /proc > and /sys, to be run at S03 and

udev uploaded to experimental

2004-02-22 Thread Marco d'Itri
I'm lazy, so I will include my last blog post as a summary. This goes to debian-glibc and the initscripts maintainer as well because S35mountkernfs needs to be split in two parts: one which will mount /proc and /sys, to be run at S03 and one for the rest, which can be left at S35. This will have t

Re: agzdfiimo

2004-02-22 Thread mardam
** ** EMAIL FILTER / EMAIL FILTER / EMAIL FILTER / EMAIL FILTER / EMAIL FILTER ** ** Sender:debian-glibc@lists.debian.org Recipient: [EMAIL PRO

Re: udev uploaded to experimental

2004-02-22 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:43:50, Marco d'Itri wrote: > I'm lazy, so I will include my last blog post as a summary. > > This goes to debian-glibc and the initscripts maintainer as well because > S35mountkernfs needs to be split in two parts: one which will mount /proc > and /sys, to be run at S03 and

udev uploaded to experimental

2004-02-22 Thread Marco d'Itri
I'm lazy, so I will include my last blog post as a summary. This goes to debian-glibc and the initscripts maintainer as well because S35mountkernfs needs to be split in two parts: one which will mount /proc and /sys, to be run at S03 and one for the rest, which can be left at S35. This will have t

Re: agzdfiimo

2004-02-22 Thread mardam
** ** EMAIL FILTER / EMAIL FILTER / EMAIL FILTER / EMAIL FILTER / EMAIL FILTER ** ** Sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj

Processed: r

2004-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 67921 Bug#67921: glob(3) doesn't treat \ correctly Bug reopened, originator not changed. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)