Bug#249408: marked as done (asm/ headers in LINUX_SOURCE not used unless it is a real directory)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#249408: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#247430: marked as done (libc6-udeb: please add libnss_files)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#247430: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#247241: marked as done (FTBFS: no rule to make target build_tree when running 'debian/rules binary')

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#247241: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#246355: marked as done ([patch] A couple of required libraries are missing in libc0.3-dev)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#246355: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#243394: marked as done ([s390 patch] Improved backtrace for s390*)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#243394: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#245643: marked as done (libc6: problem with $kernel_ver in preinst)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245643: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#246557: marked as done (locales: Typo in locale(1): LOC_PATH instead of LOCPATH)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#246557: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#245657: marked as done (ro_RO ISO-8859-2 generation broken)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245657: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#249559: marked as done (vsyslog fails)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#249559: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#247430: marked as done (libc6-udeb: please add libnss_files)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#247430: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#249408: marked as done (asm/ headers in LINUX_SOURCE not used unless it is a real directory)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#249408: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#247241: marked as done (FTBFS: no rule to make target build_tree when running 'debian/rules binary')

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#247241: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#246355: marked as done ([patch] A couple of required libraries are missing in libc0.3-dev)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#246355: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#243394: marked as done ([s390 patch] Improved backtrace for s390*)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#243394: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#245643: marked as done (libc6: problem with $kernel_ver in preinst)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245643: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#245657: marked as done (ro_RO ISO-8859-2 generation broken)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245657: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#246557: marked as done (locales: Typo in locale(1): LOC_PATH instead of LOCPATH)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#246557: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#249559: marked as done (vsyslog fails)

Your message dated Sat, 29 May 2004 17:59:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#249559: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#165760: SENDER ! Virus found in message from you !

You sent to user [EMAIL PROTECTED] message with VIRUS . == KAV Report: == archive: Mail /html suspicion: Exploit.IFrame.FileDownload message.scr infected: I-Worm.NetSky.q ==

Bug#165760: SENDER ! Virus found in message from you !

You sent to user [EMAIL PROTECTED] message with VIRUS . == KAV Report: == archive: Mail /html suspicion: Exploit.IFrame.FileDownload message.scr infected: I-Worm.NetSky.q ==

Your hosting account,inure

Dutton,{ Need affordable but reliable web hosting for only $5/month? -800 MB Disk Space -Unlimited email accounts -FREE Shopping Cart... and much more! Please contact us to take advantage of this new offer at http://nakafyzoi.thebiggestand.com/amite/host.htm weaken

Your hosting account,inure

Dutton,{ Need affordable but reliable web hosting for only $5/month? -800 MB Disk Space -Unlimited email accounts -FREE Shopping Cart... and much more! Please contact us to take advantage of this new offer at http://nakafyzoi.thebiggestand.com/amite/host.htm weaken