Bug#260928: marked as done (locales: en_US.ISO8859-1 LC_COLLATE seems wrong: sorts AaBbCc, not ABCabc?)

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:35:24 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#260928: locales: en_US.ISO8859-1 LC_COLLATE seems wrong: sorts AaBbCc, not ABCabc? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Re: libc6-dbg

2004-07-23 Thread GOTO Masanori
Hi, At Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:32:34 +0200 (CEST), Fabien Carrion wrote: > I got a little suggestion for the package libc6-dbg. I used it for a > little while, and the principal limitation is that we can't debug inside > the macros. So I would like to know if you planed to do an another package > with

Re: [PATCH] Crypto blowfish addition to glibc - possible?

2004-07-23 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 02:51:26 +0200, Marek Habersack wrote: > I have just finished compiling glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 patched to contain the > crypt-blowfish support from the OWL project (http://openwall.com/crypt/). I > applied, compiled and is running without any even the slightest problem. My > goal

Bug#261035: libc6: relocation errors again ...

2004-07-23 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13 Severity: normal I encounteded this while trying to run IBM's ViaVoice and xvoice (speech recognition software). I had previously ('round 2002) good results, but didn't reinstall it on a newer machine until now. Background : IBM's apps (installer, voice train

Bug#261082: glibc: Please add the '-fno-unit-at-a-time' patch from upstream for amd64/gcc-3.4 support

2004-07-23 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: glibc Severity: wishlist Tags: patch To compile glibc on amd64 (and other architectures) with gcc-3.4, the '-fno-unit-at-a-time' patch from upstream is necessary. Without this patch, the gcc-3.4 compiler reorders some assembly code and the resulting pthread libraries will segfault. The

Re: Bug#260222: ITP: libmqueue -- POSIX message queues library for Linux

2004-07-23 Thread Mattia Dongili
[Cc-ing d-devel and d-glibc to try to have full opinions] On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 08:48:36PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > This library has been included in glibc 2.3.4 (04/08/2004 in changelog) > > and will no more actively maintaind by upstream as a separate library. > > I'd like to packag

Re: Bug#260222: ITP: libmqueue -- POSIX message queues library for Linux

2004-07-23 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:45:52 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > [Cc-ing d-devel and d-glibc to try to have full opinions] > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 08:48:36PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > This library has been included in glibc 2.3.4 (04/08/2004 in changelog) > > > and will no more actively

Re: Bug#260222: ITP: libmqueue -- POSIX message queues library for Linux

2004-07-23 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 07:05:35PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:45:52 +0200, > Mattia Dongili wrote: > > [Cc-ing d-devel and d-glibc to try to have full opinions] > > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 08:48:36PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > This library has been includ

Re: Bug#260222: ITP: libmqueue -- POSIX message queues library for Linux

2004-07-23 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 07:05:35PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > I don't understand why you think it's bad idea. Until glibc included > mqueue, it was existed as separated library. AFAIK, there is no > application that use mqueue library in main. This means user links > mqueue library with his a

Re: Bug#260222: ITP: libmqueue -- POSIX message queues library for Linux

2004-07-23 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:28:56 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 07:05:35PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > I don't understand why you think it's bad idea. Until glibc included > > mqueue, it was existed as separated library. AFAIK, there is no > > application that use mqueu

Re: Bug#260222: ITP: libmqueue -- POSIX message queues library for Linux

2004-07-23 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 07:05:35PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > I don't understand why you think it's bad idea. Until glibc included > > mqueue, it was existed as separated library. AFAIK, there is no > > application that use

Re: libc6-dbg

2004-07-23 Thread GOTO Masanori
Hi, At Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:32:34 +0200 (CEST), Fabien Carrion wrote: > I got a little suggestion for the package libc6-dbg. I used it for a > little while, and the principal limitation is that we can't debug inside > the macros. So I would like to know if you planed to do an another package > with

Re: [PATCH] Crypto blowfish addition to glibc - possible?

2004-07-23 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 02:51:26 +0200, Marek Habersack wrote: > I have just finished compiling glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 patched to contain the > crypt-blowfish support from the OWL project (http://openwall.com/crypt/). I > applied, compiled and is running without any even the slightest problem. My > goal

Re: Bug#260222: ITP: libmqueue -- POSIX message queues library for Linux

2004-07-23 Thread Mattia Dongili
[Cc-ing d-devel and d-glibc to try to have full opinions] On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 08:48:36PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > This library has been included in glibc 2.3.4 (04/08/2004 in changelog) > > and will no more actively maintaind by upstream as a separate library. > > I'd like to packag

Re: Bug#260222: ITP: libmqueue -- POSIX message queues library for Linux

2004-07-23 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:45:52 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > [Cc-ing d-devel and d-glibc to try to have full opinions] > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 08:48:36PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > This library has been included in glibc 2.3.4 (04/08/2004 in changelog) > > > and will no more actively

Bug#261035: libc6: relocation errors again ...

2004-07-23 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13 Severity: normal I encounteded this while trying to run IBM's ViaVoice and xvoice (speech recognition software). I had previously ('round 2002) good results, but didn't reinstall it on a newer machine until now. Background : IBM's apps (installer, voice train

Re: Bug#260222: ITP: libmqueue -- POSIX message queues library for Linux

2004-07-23 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 07:05:35PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:45:52 +0200, > Mattia Dongili wrote: > > [Cc-ing d-devel and d-glibc to try to have full opinions] > > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 08:48:36PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > This library has been includ

Re: Bug#260222: ITP: libmqueue -- POSIX message queues library for Linux

2004-07-23 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 07:05:35PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > I don't understand why you think it's bad idea. Until glibc included > mqueue, it was existed as separated library. AFAIK, there is no > application that use mqueue library in main. This means user links > mqueue library with his a

Bug#261082: glibc: Please add the '-fno-unit-at-a-time' patch from upstream for amd64/gcc-3.4 support

2004-07-23 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: glibc Severity: wishlist Tags: patch To compile glibc on amd64 (and other architectures) with gcc-3.4, the '-fno-unit-at-a-time' patch from upstream is necessary. Without this patch, the gcc-3.4 compiler reorders some assembly code and the resulting pthread libraries will segfault. The

Re: Bug#260222: ITP: libmqueue -- POSIX message queues library for Linux

2004-07-23 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:28:56 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 07:05:35PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > I don't understand why you think it's bad idea. Until glibc included > > mqueue, it was existed as separated library. AFAIK, there is no > > application that use mqueu

Re: Bug#260222: ITP: libmqueue -- POSIX message queues library for Linux

2004-07-23 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 07:05:35PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > I don't understand why you think it's bad idea. Until glibc included > > mqueue, it was existed as separated library. AFAIK, there is no > > application that use

Processed: cloning

2004-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 254314 -1 Bug#254314: regexec(): segfaults in UTF-8 locales under some circumstances Bug 254314 cloned as bug 261135. > submitter-1 ! Bug#261135: regexec(): segfaults in UTF-8 locales under some circumstances Changed Bug submitter from Andrea