Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-16
Severity: wishlist
Recent versions of SuSE (e.g. SuSE 9.1, SLES 9) and Red Hat (RHEL 3AS,
Fedora Core >= 1) distributions provide a support library with glibc to
allow users to make use of the kernel's asynchronous IO interfaces.
This additional library offers
W liście z pon, 27-09-2004, godz. 02:09, GOTO Masanori pisze:
> The point is that if directories in ld.so.conf has non-debian glibc,
> it may cause such problems.
No, the only glibc I have is _debian_ one.
Even I removed /etc/ld.so.conf, it still segfault:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc# LD_LIBRARY_PAT
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:04:18 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#271878: asm/setup.h non-existent #include on ppc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:10:55 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273248: libc6-i686: crashed my box just after install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
also sprach GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.27.1117 +0200]:
> Hmm... Did you read my previous posts?
I wonder if you ever read any of ours, and let your brain do some
thinking upon doing so.
> > (a) report an error and do not display the date
> > or
> > (b) report the GMT time *
At Sun, 26 Sep 2004 19:31:13 +0200,
Matthias Grimm wrote:
> > Matthias Grimm wrote:
> > > If I try to debug my programs with ddd I got following error message:
> > >
> > > ../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32/elf/start.S: Source not found
> > >
> > > This is caused by unnecessary debug symbols in /usr/li
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 04:36:17AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Then the bug is the program which uses asm/setup.h. It's not for
> userland headers.
Then I would ask why you supply it?
Should one consider a bootloader userland?
However, I don't really care, I was just pointing out a bug in
y
On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 07:49, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> I didn't reappear this problem. Moreover, if globfree() returns
> GLOB_ABORTED, globfree() should not be called from looking at source
> code.
That's exactly the problem. If you want to avoid a memory leak, there
are circumstances where you mus
At Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:44:11 +0200,
Claus Fischer wrote:
> If you'd verified this bug you'd have found that the dlclose
> has nothing to do with it.
>
> PLEASE TRY ON A RECENT SARGE:
I'm debian glibc package maintainer using the latest sarge and sid.
> cat >main.c < #include
> int main(int argc
Hi,
As 192.51.44.41 just requested, here your token for loggin in on
http://wolffelaar.nl/~sarge
The token belonging to "GNU Libc Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" is:
4bec746e
Note that it is important that you duplicate your name as shown above exactly,
otherwise it won't work.
Regards,
Jeroe
At Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:02:52 -0500,
Jeff Licquia wrote:
> I have been busy with other pressing issues recently, but when I get the
> chance, I will try and give you a conclusive test case. Thanks for
> applying it for sarge, at least.
Thanks for your reply, I expect your feedback.
Regards,
-- go
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:02:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#233301: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:02:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#264884: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:02:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#266637: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:02:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#269747: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:02:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#270998: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
16 matches
Mail list logo
