Re: libunwind in unstable

Ian Wienand writes: On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 05:30:38PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: That would make sense. libstdc++5 calls _Unwind_Resume() which is/should be implemented by libunwind.so.7. With older versions of GCC, it was implemented as part of libgcc_eh.a/libgcc_s.so. Actually,

File was infected with a virus

(BNote: JP stands for Japanese. (B (BALERT!! (BThis e-mail contained one or more virus-infected files and have been rejected. (B(JP:$B%3%s%T%e!<%?%&%#%k%9$rH/8+$7$^$7$?$N$G!"%a!<%k$NAw?.$rCf;_$7$^$7$?!#(J) (B (BThe following attachments were infected: (B(JP:[EMAIL

Re: libunwind in unstable

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:27:52 +0100, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Matthias Is the patch in #278836 a prerequisite for the above Matthias changes, or can it be done without it? If the gas-patch isn't applied, you run the risk of getting wrong unwind-info into object-files. For

Bug#219352: Simple test case for xmms/nvidia/TLS bug

True, the error message is not ideal, but if I understand your test case correctly, this only happens when there would have been unresolved symbols anyway. So surely there is another bug here, no? -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#219352: Simple test case for xmms/nvidia/TLS bug

Hi... On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 07:59 am, you wrote: True, the error message is not ideal, but if I understand your test case correctly, this only happens when there would have been unresolved symbols anyway. So surely there is another bug here, no? Quote from dlopen(3): If dlopen() fails

Re: libunwind in unstable

David Mosberger writes: On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:27:52 +0100, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Matthias Is the patch in #278836 a prerequisite for the above Matthias changes, or can it be done without it? If the gas-patch isn't applied, you run the risk of getting wrong

Re: libunwind in unstable

On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:26:01 +0100, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Matthias From my point of view we can get around with it by Matthias including the libunwind shared library in libgcc1 for the Matthias sarge release. I'm worried about the version skew of the Matthias unwind

Re: libunwind in unstable

David Mosberger writes: On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:26:01 +0100, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Matthias From my point of view we can get around with it by Matthias including the libunwind shared library in libgcc1 for the Matthias sarge release. I'm worried about the version