Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: Re: little NPTL SCHED_FIFO test program

2005-02-27 Thread Andreas Kuckartz
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote (August 21, 2004 - half a year ago): If not now, then when do you expect this to be in unstable? Personal judgement: With about 90% probability after the first release of sarge. I was looking for a timeframe. Weeks, months, years? The debian release

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: Re: little NPTL SCHED_FIFO test program

2005-02-27 Thread Lee Revell
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 17:04 +0100, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: Daniel Jacobowitz wrote (August 21, 2004 - half a year ago): If not now, then when do you expect this to be in unstable? Personal judgement: With about 90% probability after the first release of sarge. I

Re: Short question(s)

2005-02-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:50:48 +0100, Daniele Cruciani wrote: I do want to build glibc setting kernel minimal version to 2.4.0 (2.4.22 .. does matter last digit??), and compile it with flags for my machine (PIII). (I actually use kernel 2.6.10) Will I fall in any trouble? It depends on

Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm

2005-02-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:40:33 +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-17 Severity: critical File: linux-kernel-header Justification: breaks the whole system Hi, when one tries to run pvmove or lvsnapshot on / the lvm will deadlock itself

Bug#292673: additional info

2005-02-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:17:44 -0800, David Mosberger wrote: While there hasn't been any discussion for glibc bugzilla report #685 [1], private communication with one of the glibc maintainers indicates that this issue is not considered to be a glibc bug because, officially, glibc supports only

Bug#296490: marked as done (libc6: getgrnam segfault (using __nscd_getgrnam_r))

2005-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:40:44 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#296490: libc6: getgrnam segfault (using __nscd_getgrnam_r) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: Re: Bug#295618: broken /etc/init.d/devpts.sh script won't work

2005-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 295618 woody Bug#295618: broken /etc/init.d/devpts.sh script won't work There were no tags set. Tags added: woody thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#295618: broken /etc/init.d/devpts.sh script won't work

2005-02-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
tags 295618 woody thanks At Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:52:10 +1300, John R. McPherson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Debian stable, with 2.6 kernel) /etc/init.d/devpts.sh contains the following: ## devpts_avail=`grep -qci '[[:space:]]devpts' /proc/filesystems || true` devpts_mounted=`grep -qci

Bug#295573: Bug#233308: Esperanto translations?

2005-02-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:30:23 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): While I'm at it, something VERY important that slept out in this discussion: the list of supported languages for sarge is *closed*. For size constraints, and for being sure that

Bug#292673: additional info

2005-02-27 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 02:17:44PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: While there hasn't been any discussion for glibc bugzilla report #685 [1], private communication with one of the glibc maintainers indicates that this issue is not considered to be a glibc bug because, officially, glibc supports

Bug#295680: libc6: getgrname returns a result that doesn't belong to /etc/group

2005-02-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:37:25 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: The getgrname(3) man page says: The getgrnam() function returns a pointer to a structure containing the group information from /etc/group for the entry that matches the group name name. But here, the getgrname function

Bug#274852: Bug #274852: But in which upstream version?

2005-02-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:36:23 +0100, David Martnez Moreno wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xmms libmikmod.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: 72: _dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion `result =

Bug#274852: Bug #274852: But in which upstream version?

2005-02-27 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:23:14AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:36:23 +0100, David Mart?nez Moreno wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xmms libmikmod.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c:

Bug#274852: Bug #274852: But in which upstream version?

2005-02-27 Thread David Martínez Moreno
El Lunes, 28 de Febrero de 2005 02:23, GOTO Masanori escribi: At Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:36:23 +0100, David Martnez Moreno wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xmms libmikmod.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c:

Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm

2005-02-27 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:40:33 +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-17 Severity: critical File: linux-kernel-header Justification: breaks the whole system Hi, when one tries to run pvmove or

Bug#295680: libc6: getgrname returns a result that doesn't belong to /etc/group

2005-02-27 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-02-28 10:12:14 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:37:25 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: The getgrname(3) man page says: The getgrnam() function returns a pointer to a structure containing the group information from /etc/group for the entry that matches the