Bug#302156: marked as done (libc6: README.linuxthreads.gz)

2005-03-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:57:59 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302156: libc6: README.linuxthreads.gz has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#301455: ldd no longer puts a => before /bin/ld-linux.so.2

2005-03-30 Thread George Cristian Birzan
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 12:23:30PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > I expect you to explain why mkinitrd breaks with new ldd. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /bin/bash | sed 's/.*=>[[:blank:]]*\([^[:blank:]]*\).*/\1/' (0xe000) /lib/libncurses.so.5 /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 /lib/tls/libc.so.6 /lib/ld-

Bug#302156: libc6: README.linuxthreads.gz

2005-03-30 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: [snip] > From a short glance at README.linuxthreads.gz, it seems to me that this > file deals mostly or only with the classical 'linuxthreads' > implementation. Shouldn't this file contain a remark that it is > obsolete on newer systems (where NPTL is u

Bug#302156: libc6: README.linuxthreads.gz

2005-03-30 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-20 Severity: minor -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, From a short glance at README.linuxthreads.gz, it seems to me that this file deals mostly or only with the classical 'linuxthreads' implementation. Shouldn't this file contain a remark that i

Bug#301641: Linux kernel include files still inconsistent on sarge

2005-03-30 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:32:40 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > It is impossible to compile star using official methods (adding > > > other include files that are allowed to be included by user space program= > > > s). > > > > How about to use headers in e2fslibs-dev package? It's designed for >