Hi Steve,
Thanks for you explanation (and for Daniel Jacobowit too). I've made a big
mistake on relating this
stupid bug.
Thanks!
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu em Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:51:39 -0700:
> severity 333927 normal
> thanks
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 11:38:09AM -0300, Gl
Accepted:
glibc-doc_2.3.5-7_all.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.5-7_all.deb
glibc_2.3.5-7.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.5-7.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.5-7.dsc
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.5-7.dsc
libc6-amd64_2.3.5-7_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-amd64_2.3.5-7_i386.deb
libc6-
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:05:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325460: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:05:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333766: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:05:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331838: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:05:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326856: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:05:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329043: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:05:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326492: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:05:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326856: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:05:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326492: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:05:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310047: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
glibc-doc_2.3.5-7_all.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.5-7_all.deb
glibc_2.3.5-7.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.5-7.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.5-7.dsc
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.5-7.dsc
(new) libc6-amd64_2.3.5-7_i386.deb required base
GNU C Library: 64bit Shared libraries for AMD64
glibc_2.3.5-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
glibc_2.3.5-7.dsc
glibc_2.3.5-7.diff.gz
glibc-doc_2.3.5-7_all.deb
locales_2.3.5-7_all.deb
libc6_2.3.5-7_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.5-7_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.5-7_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.5-7_i386.deb
li
Author: dan
Date: 2005-10-14 23:07:28 + (Fri, 14 Oct 2005)
New Revision: 1050
Added:
glibc-package/tags/2.3.5-7/
Log:
[svn-buildpackage] Tagging glibc (2.3.5-7)
Copied: glibc-package/tags/2.3.5-7 (from rev 1049, glibc-package/trunk)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 10:28:27PM +, Joel Soete wrote:
>
>
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> >[...]
>
>
> >Oh yes, BTW, I have seen that glibc does not built anymore on hppa. It
> >seems the new binutils does not accept some assembly instructions.
> >Currently I am doing my tests with binutil
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[...]
Oh yes, BTW, I have seen that glibc does not built anymore on hppa. It
seems the new binutils does not accept some assembly instructions.
Currently I am doing my tests with binutils 2.16.1. It has to be fixed
before uploading a new glibc, but unfortunately I d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 333927 normal
Bug#333927: libc6: Timezone calculation for files in /usr/share/zoneinfo/Etc
are inversed!
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
severity 333927 normal
thanks
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 11:38:09AM -0300, Gleydson Mazioli da Silva wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
> The date show by "date" command (or zdump) for localtime configured
> for files in /
Author: dan
Date: 2005-10-14 18:36:01 + (Fri, 14 Oct 2005)
New Revision: 1049
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/
Log:
Add mergeWithUpstream property.
Property changes on: glibc-package/trunk/debian
___
Name: mergeWithUpst
Author: dan
Date: 2005-10-14 18:33:36 + (Fri, 14 Oct 2005)
New Revision: 1048
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hppa-fenv-align.dpatch
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hppa-iitlbp.dpatch
Log:
Correct typos in patches.
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hppa-fenv-
Author: dan
Date: 2005-10-14 18:19:01 + (Fri, 14 Oct 2005)
New Revision: 1047
Added:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hppa-fenv-align.dpatch
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list
Log:
* Use 8-byte-aligned buffers for doubleword FP
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:24:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333927: libc6: Timezone calculation for files in
/usr/share/zoneinfo/Etc are inversed!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Author: dan
Date: 2005-10-14 17:40:36 + (Fri, 14 Oct 2005)
New Revision: 1046
Added:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hppa-iitlbp.dpatch
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list
Log:
* Update hppa assembly for current CVS binutils.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 08:58:18AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Funny, I've got the same setup, and the check has not triggered in the
> past. I can reproduce it, though. Let me poke around.
... that would be because I installed this system after the last upload
of glibc. I've got a fix no
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
The date show by "date" command (or zdump) for localtime configured
for files in /usr/share/zoneinfo/Etc are inversed (GMT-Number act as
GMT+Number, and GMT+Number work like GMT-Number) this cause b
Dear ITtoolbox Groups Subscriber,
Your message has NOT been distributed to the ITtoolbox BusinessObjects-L
discussion group. Please continue reading for further details and instructions.
On Wednesday, May 26, 2004, ITtoolbox launched nine new discussion topics, each
focusing on specific Busines
Author: dan
Date: 2005-10-14 13:46:00 + (Fri, 14 Oct 2005)
New Revision: 1045
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.preinst
Log:
* Do not complain about incompatible libraries in /etc/ld.so.conf
(Closes: #310047).
Modified: gl
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:37:53AM +0200, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> On Friday 14 October 2005 04:47, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > When upgrading libc6 it checks for other installations of libc on the
> > > same system. Unfortunately it does not distinguish between the amd64
> > > and x86 versions
How is it going bro
You'll never guess what happened to me last friday.
Basically found hot date site that you can join without paying.
So many fan gals are there messaging and meeting eachother.
And it's clear there is someone (or more than one) for you.
Although most of them want one-nighter
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 10:50:38AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 11:58:10PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 12:02:04AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > ...
> > > Just to clarify: if you fix the inline asm in glibc, then you don't
> > > need to re
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 11:58:10PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 12:02:04AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> ...
> > Just to clarify: if you fix the inline asm in glibc, then you don't
> > need to recompile any of the currently broken libraries or
> > applications.
>
> We
On Friday 14 October 2005 04:47, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > When upgrading libc6 it checks for other installations of libc on the
> > same system. Unfortunately it does not distinguish between the amd64
> > and x86 versions and stops the installation although no real conflict
> > would have resul
32 matches
Mail list logo
