On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 07:51 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Brian M. Carlson a écrit :
> > # bcc'd to control
> > forwarded 227386 http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2363
> > thanks, control, and have a nice day
> >
> > On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 17:36 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> T
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 17:37 +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> That seems overly complex. You should most certainly know the range of
> your own error codes, so something like the below looks much simpler (no
> script needed, no dependance on the value of standard error codes):
The problem with that is
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
If there's
consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
/emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
My se
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > If there's
> > consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
> > /emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
> My sense is that the "c
hi,
the new portuguese translation for glibc 2.3.6-2 in attach
$ msgfmt -o /dev/null --statistics pt.po
10 translated messages.
best regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
>
>You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
>glibc. The English template has been changed, and
On 2006-02-20 (Mon), at 22:27:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for glibc.
> [...]
Updated file is attached to this e-mail.
>-Choices: ${locales}
>+__Choices: All locales, ${locales}
Are you sure this ${locales} should be marked
Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
If there's
consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
/emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
My sense i
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 10:27:03PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
> glibc. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
> are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing.
> I would be grateful if y
Hi,
Attached is an updated Danish translatino for glibc.
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-20 23:31:41]:
> Hi,
>
> You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
> glibc. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
> are marked "fuzzy" in you
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> In the end, I'd like to get rid of ia32-libs, and have it be a
> dummy package. But on the other hand, I don't want to make a
> biarch version of things like the X libraries.
you can't get rid of it on ia64 unless you either drop the 32bit
support or else you provide a cross
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > If there's
> > consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
> > /emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
>
> My sense is that the
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> If there's
> consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
> /emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
My sense is that the "concensus" that exists is around FHS compliance.
While I personally consi
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 08:25:34AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> Anyway, my problem is that the fact that these two errors are
> the same is causing my code to break very badly. I have a
> library that contains its own error codes that will be negative
> if casted to an int. Additionally, I w
Hi,
I've got a PC with Windows XP, with a NTFS hard
disk. Like before, I made a Linux ext2 partition where I installed Debian (
along with a swap linux partition).
The problem is that when I tryed to run a program
in Debian that would write to the disk, I found out that I only had read-only
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The amd64 port is currently providing 32-bit libraries via the ia32-libs
> package. This package was originally designed for ia64, and thus install
> 32-bit libraries in /emul/ia32-linux/ . This is not compliant with the
> FHS for a
15 matches
Mail list logo
