Your message dated Tue, 11 Apr 2006 07:56:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361675: [i386] kernel requirement needs to be updated to
2.4.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
[Cc:ing parisc-linux as interested people are there]
Hi!
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
In the upstream glibc repository, both M68K and HPPA ports have been
moved into the separate "ports" repository. This means two things:
- The core glibc maintainers will not update them when sweeping
chang
Gabor Gombas wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:28:18AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
However, that does not fix #345907. Does anybody has an idea how to fix
that? I think it is a good idea to let the user update it's timezone
manually, given the way we handle timezone in the stable release (tho
Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:42:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361642: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:42:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174270: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:42:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361101: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:42:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361338: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:42:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361091: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:42:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#220992: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:42:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361091: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:42:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#226716: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:42:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#357523: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:42:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360383: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:42:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346342: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:42:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361091: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
glibc-doc_2.3.6-6_all.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.6-6_all.deb
glibc_2.3.6-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.6-6.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.6-6.dsc
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.6-6.dsc
libc6-amd64_2.3.6-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-amd64_2.3.6-6_i386.deb
libc6-dbg_2.3.6-6
glibc_2.3.6-6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
glibc_2.3.6-6.dsc
glibc_2.3.6-6.diff.gz
glibc-doc_2.3.6-6_all.deb
locales_2.3.6-6_all.deb
libc6_2.3.6-6_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.6-6_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.6-6_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.6-6_i386.deb
li
(new) tzdata_2006c-2.diff.gz required libs
(new) tzdata_2006c-2.dsc required libs
(new) tzdata_2006c-2_all.deb required libs
Time Zone and Daylight Saving Time Data
This package contains data that represent the history of local time for many
representative locations around the globe. It is update
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 22:54:42 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1405
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Start a new changelog entry
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- glibc-p
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 22:53:30 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1403
Removed:
glibc-package/tags/2.3.6-6/
Log:
This time the package has really been uploaded, tagging it (1)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 22:52:07 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1402
Modified:
tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Start a new changelog entry
Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- tzdata/trunk/debian/c
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 22:51:33 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1401
Added:
tzdata/tags/2006c-2/
tzdata/tags/2006c-2/debian/changelog
tzdata/tags/2006c-2/debian/control
tzdata/tags/2006c-2/debian/patches/
tzdata/tags/2006c-2/debian/postinst
tzdata/tags/2006c-2/de
tzdata_2006c-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tzdata_2006c-2.dsc
tzdata_2006c-2.diff.gz
tzdata_2006c-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 22:50:49 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1400
Modified:
tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Version 2006c-2 uploaded
Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- tzdata/trunk/debian/chan
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 22:26:00 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1399
Modified:
tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
tzdata/trunk/debian/control
Log:
Drop the conflicts, it create problems during upgrade:
E: This installation run will require temporarily removing the essential
pack
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 22:07:10 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1398
Removed:
tzdata/trunk/debian/preinst
Modified:
tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* Drop the preinst script, we don't support upgrade from Potato :-)
Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
===
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 22:05:22 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1397
Modified:
tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
tzdata/trunk/debian/control
Log:
* Add Conflicts: libc0.1 (<< 2.3.6-6), libc0.3 (<< 2.3.6-6), libc6 (<<
2.3.6-6),
libc6.1 (<< 2.3.6-6)
Modified: tzda
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 21:58:07 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1396
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff
Log:
Last time fix:
Update of the GNU/kFreeBSD patch
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff
=
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 21:57:50 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1395
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk
Log:
Last time fix:
* Correctly replace DEB_HOST_ARCH by its value in libc6.preinst. Thanks to
Denis for
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 20:52:29 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1394
Modified:
tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
tzdata/trunk/debian/control
Log:
* Drop the dependency on libc-bin.
Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
=
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 19:50:30 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1393
Added:
glibc-package/tags/2.3.6-6/
Removed:
glibc-package/2.3.6-6/
Log:
Put the tagged version in the right directory
Copied: glibc-package/tags/2.3.6-6 (from rev 1391, glibc-package/2.3.6-6)
--
To UN
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 19:45:39 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1392
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Start a new changelog entry
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- glibc-p
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 19:42:34 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1390
Removed:
glibc-package/tags/2.3.6-6/
Log:
The package has been rejected by the ftp-masters, removing the tag.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 18:24:52 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1388
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc-alt.install
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc-otherbuild.install
glibc-package/trunk/debian/rules
Le Lun 10 Avril 2006 19:41, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> Anthony Towns a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a reject of the new -bin packages (both of them).
> >
> > The issues with the -bin package are that it may cause upgrade
> > problems, both in that upgrading from existing libc's may result in
> >
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 17:26:13 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1387
Added:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc-dev.manpages
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.docs
Removed:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc-alt-dev.preinst
glibc-package/t
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 07:42:41AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Then on the bug itself, I will try to investigate that. The solution is
> not trivial, if you look at the tzconfig script, you may notice that the
> script use a readlink on /etc/localtime. Replacing it by a plain file
> may have con
Joey Hess a écrit :
Gabor Gombas wrote:
How about storing the md5sum of /etc/localtime and updating it only if
the checksum has not been changed (and warning the user otherwise).
X.org does something similar for auto-updating xorg.conf if the user did
not change it manually.
It should even b
Hi all,
Today I have uploaded a new glibc which, among other changes, splits
libc6 into libc6 + libc-bin and libc6-dev into libc6-dev + libc-dev-bin.
Those changes are required to be able to implement multiarch, because
the files should not overlap. If we have for example an amd64 libc and
a
Hi,
This is a reject of the new -bin packages (both of them).
The issues with the -bin package are that it may cause upgrade problems, both
in that upgrading from existing libc's may result in a broken system between
the new libc6 being unpacked and the new libc-bin being installed (ldconfig
not
Gabor Gombas wrote:
> How about storing the md5sum of /etc/localtime and updating it only if
> the checksum has not been changed (and warning the user otherwise).
> X.org does something similar for auto-updating xorg.conf if the user did
> not change it manually.
It should even be possible to use
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 14:41:19 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1386
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/script.in/kernelcheck.sh
Log:
* script.in/kernelcheck.sh: Also take in account 64-bit mips(el) kernels.
Modified: glibc-package
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 07:42:41AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Then on the bug itself, I will try to investigate that. The solution is
> not trivial, if you look at the tzconfig script, you may notice that the
> script use a readlink on /etc/localtime. Replacing it by a plain file
> may have co
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 07:42:41AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi!
>
> First of all, please don't be so agressive. If you look at the bug log,
> we never say we won't fix the bug because of ideologicial concerns.
> Actually nobody from the glibc team answered to the bug report, so I
> don't kno
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:28:18AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> However, that does not fix #345907. Does anybody has an idea how to fix
> that? I think it is a good idea to let the user update it's timezone
> manually, given the way we handle timezone in the stable release (though
> it should
higuita wrote:
> Hi
>
> tested in debian mips, works fine in my machines
>
> replaced all (but one already commented) dpkg call with plain and old
> if tests
>
> in the end, checking if the machine is running the correct architecture
> is hard to check and should be extremely rare, so i tweak it
In the upstream glibc repository, both M68K and HPPA ports have been
moved into the separate "ports" repository. This means two things:
- The core glibc maintainers will not update them when sweeping
changes are made. This was already the case; they're just making
it clearer.
- ACLs
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 09:55:13 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1385
Added:
tzdata/trunk/debian/patches/
tzdata/trunk/debian/patches/series
tzdata/trunk/debian/patches/systemv.diff
Modified:
tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* patches/systemv.diff: create the System
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 09:53:58 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1384
Modified:
tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
tzdata/trunk/debian/control
tzdata/trunk/debian/rules
Log:
* Add a patching system.
Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
==
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 09:29:53 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1383
Modified:
tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
tzdata/trunk/debian/postinst
Log:
* Put a copy of the current timezone into /etc/localtime instead of a
symlink.
Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 09:29:20 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1382
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Bug#345907 is actually not fixed, as tzdata will update /etc/localtime, thus
overriding local changes.
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
===
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:22:18AM +, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-04-10 06:22:16 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1381
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/local/manpages/tzconfig.8
glibc-package
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:22:18AM +, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Author: aurel32
> Date: 2006-04-10 06:22:16 + (Mon, 10 Apr 2006)
> New Revision: 1381
>
> Modified:
>glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
>glibc-package/trunk/debian/local/manpages/tzconfig.8
>glibc-package/trunk/deb
53 matches
Mail list logo
