r1707 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian: . debhelper.in rules.d

Author: schizo Date: 2006-08-08 03:30:45 + (Tue, 08 Aug 2006) New Revision: 1707 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/debhelper.in/libc-dev.install glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/rules.d/build.mk Log: Remove some

r1706 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian: . control.in sysdeps

Author: aurel32 Date: 2006-08-07 23:48:41 + (Mon, 07 Aug 2006) New Revision: 1706 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/control glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/control.in/main glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/sysdeps/amd64.mk Log: lib32ssp0 or lib64ssp0 are

Re: libc-i686

> > Any chance on a libc-p4? > Any additional optimisations need to have benchmarks proving that > they're worth the hassle. Every one that we add carries the cost of > additional troubleshooting, etc. > Do you have data that suggests that there's a notable improvement tobe > had? I'll see if I c

Re: libc-i686

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:17:54PM +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote: > Any chance on a libc-p4? Any additional optimisations need to have benchmarks proving that they're worth the hassle. Every one that we add carries the cost of additional troubleshooting, etc. Do you have data that suggests t

libc-i686

Hi, Any chance on a libc-p4? Folkert van Heusden www.vanheusden.com/multitail - multitail is tail on steroids. multiple windows, filtering, coloring, anything you can think of -- Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1

Bug#378295: Bug #378295 not fixed yet, joystick.h still missing three lines of changes

There are still three instances of "int32_t" in linux/joystick.h, which causes compilation to fail on programs that use it (unless they happen to include stdint.h first). The needed patch is given below. diff -upr linux-kernel-headers-2.6.17.6.orig/include/linux/joystick.h linux-kernel-heade

Bug#381905: linux-kernel-headers: NGROUPS_MAX doesn't match the kernel and causes test failures

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:43:07AM -0600, Vladislav Yasevich wrote: > We have tracked this down to a mismatch in the definitions of NGROUPS_MAX > between the 2.6.8 Debian kernel and the linux-kernel-headers package. > The linux-kernel-headers package defines this value as 32, while the > kernel de

Bug#381905: linux-kernel-headers: NGROUPS_MAX doesn't match the kernel and causes test failures

Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-17 Severity: important The setgroups test from the ltp (Linux Test Project ) testsuite has unexpected behavior on Debian Sarge. The test fails reporting that setgroups() call succeeded when trying to set more gr