On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:54:41AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dnia 21-08-2006, pon o godzinie 17:06 +0200, Aurelien Jarno napisał(a):
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:15:10AM +0200, Tomasz Cichecki wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.6-19
Severity: grave
Justification: renders
Dnia 21-08-2006, pon o godzinie 17:06 +0200, Aurelien Jarno napisał(a):
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:15:10AM +0200, Tomasz Cichecki wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.6-19
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I cannot upgrade from libc6_2.3.6-19 to
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-08-22 20:18:44 + (Tue, 22 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 1767
Added:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/patches/any/cvs-sysctl.diff
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/cvs-sysctl.diff
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/changelog
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:07:47 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line libc6-dev: /usr/include/semaphore.h is broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
tags 369940 + sarge
Bug#369940: libc6 upgrade objects to my old a.out libc in /usr/local
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-08-22 20:44:59 + (Tue, 22 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 1768
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/control
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/control.in/i386
Author: barbier
Date: 2006-08-22 22:26:49 + (Tue, 22 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 1769
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/locales-depver
Log:
Bump LOCALES_COMPAT_VER to 2.3.6.ds1-1, some iso 4217 codes
had been modified in this version.
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/locales-depver
Author: aurel32
Date: 2006-08-22 22:29:02 + (Tue, 22 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 1770
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4/debian/rules.d/build.mk
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/rules.d/build.mk
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 03:56:13PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I now have a more precise idea of the problem. The following command
produce a segfault:
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libaoss.so /bin/bash -x /bin/egrep
where /bin/grep contains:
#!/bin/sh
exec grep -E
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:00:31PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 03:56:13PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I now have a more precise idea of the problem. The following command
produce a segfault:
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libaoss.so /bin/bash -x
Accepted:
glibc-doc_2.3.6.ds1-3_all.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.6.ds1-3_all.deb
glibc_2.3.6.ds1-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.6.ds1-3.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.6.ds1-3.dsc
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.6.ds1-3.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.6.ds1-3_amd64.deb
to
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:08:07AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
20:39 aurel32 To fix the problem:
20:39 aurel32 - I don't understand why __ functions are diverted in
alsa-oss, maybe this is not necessary???
Or you could call a version of open which always binds locally (I
suspect
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 03:16:17PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
submitter 382175 Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:45:08PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 10:51:54PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:47:34 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#344253: fixed in glibc 2.3.6.ds1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:47:34 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#379959: fixed in glibc 2.3.6.ds1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:47:34 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#383976: fixed in glibc 2.3.6.ds1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
The three brand name drugs available to improve sex lives are now available in
generic form at a significantly
lower price.
Pick up the one that is best for you at:
http://pedgcfv2voucz77icp7iu7p7.beennutka.st
crack front
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Accepted:
linux-kernel-headers_2.6.17.10-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-headers/linux-kernel-headers_2.6.17.10-1.diff.gz
linux-kernel-headers_2.6.17.10-1.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-headers/linux-kernel-headers_2.6.17.10-1.dsc
linux-kernel-headers_2.6.17.10-1_sparc.deb
to
Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following
I saw that. I was just about to file a bug on the kernel package...
error:
../../../../../../config/makedepend/makedepend: warning:
/usr/include/gnu/stubs.h: non-portable whitespace encountered at line 7
linux-kernel-headers_2.6.17.10-1_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-headers_2.6.17.10-1.dsc
linux-kernel-headers_2.6.17.10.orig.tar.gz
linux-kernel-headers_2.6.17.10-1.diff.gz
linux-kernel-headers_2.6.17.10-1_sparc.deb
Greetings,
20 matches
Mail list logo
