Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:43:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366469: grep segfaults
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> reassign 345378 binutils
Bug#345378: glibc: __libc_atexit section disappears with --gc-sections,
breaking exit-flushing
Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `binutils'.
>
End of m
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:23:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mktime() does not return -1 for some BROKENTIME it should
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
I've been tracking sid, that's all (for this particular computer) I
ever do.
- Craig
--
Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
http://www.enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
http://www.debian.org/ Debian GNU/Linux, software s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> reassign 353031 manpages-dev
Bug#353031: posix_fadvise defines missing
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `manpages-dev'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
reassing 353031 manpages-dev
thanks
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:52:14PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At 16 Feb 2006 13:00:08 -0500,
> Greg Stark wrote:
> > > The man pages come from manpages-dev.
> >
> > It seems like the necessary #defines should be included in each man page
> > along
> > with
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:01:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libc6: dlclose() generates SIGSEGV in destructors of shared
libraries
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:41:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line regex_internal.c bug (Re: Bug#344146: towupper(3) bug? (Re:
re_search(3) dumps core))
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:20:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319275: libc6-dbg: unusable debug information files in
/usr/lib/debug/lib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:12:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#265819: libc6: sendfile64() should fall back to sendfile()
if not implemented by the OS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
See GCC PR 31413:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31413
This change appears premature and breaks compatibility with other linux
distributions.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31413
Since ROC hasn't been dropped, this change appears premature. It
also breaks compatibility with other linux distributions.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:53:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#216512: workaround for libc crashes on incomplete
multibyte chars
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
reassign 192744 host
retitle 192744: host: doesn't use search list
thanks
On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 12:35:14AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.3.1-17
> Severity: normal
>
> There is a problem with resolving hostnames in current sid.
>
> First, here is a working one fr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> package glibc glibc-doc libc0.1 libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dev-i386
> libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-i686 libc0.1-pic libc0.1-prof libc0.1-udeb libc0.3
> libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-dev libc0.3-
Hello,
> strace output might help to diagnose this.
Thanks for the tip, I should have thought of it. I just realized my
problem... the 'host' package does not support IPv6 transport. After
fully debugging the issue with other tools, I found that things are
working fine. Please close this bug,
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-04-22 13:03:02 + (Sun, 22 Apr 2007)
New Revision: 2112
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/local-ldd.diff
Log:
* debian/patches/any/local-ldd.diff: update to discard the error message
that appears if one o
Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:27:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420301: libc6: IPv6 transport fails for resolver
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> severity 263494 minor
Bug#263494: /usr/bin/ldd: The 32/64bit ldd 'fails' to work with a 32bit kernel
Severity set to `minor' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 192744 host
Bug#192744: libc6: resolver doesn't use search list
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `host'.
> retitle 192744: host: doesn't use search list
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> thanks
Stopping processing her
Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:45:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line localtime return wrong tm->tm_gmtoff, seems zoneinfo data's
error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-04-22 10:36:40 + (Sun, 22 Apr 2007)
New Revision: 2111
Added:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/hu.po
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* New Hungarian debconf translation, by Attila Szerv?\195?\161c. Closes:
#420420.
Modified: glibc-packag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> package glibc glibc-doc libc0.1 libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dev-i386
> libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-i686 libc0.1-pic libc0.1-prof libc0.1-udeb libc0.3
> libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-dev libc0.3-
* Tim:
> Is there anything I can do to debug this directly on my system? I don't
> see anything in my system logs, which I didn't really expect to.
strace output might help to diagnose this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Package: glibc
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
Please find attached the Hungarian translation of the glibc debconf
templates.
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: glibc\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: \n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2007-04-20 10:55+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: SZERVÁC Attila <[EM
25 matches
Mail list logo