Processed: setting package to glibc glibc-doc libc0.1 libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dev-i386 libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-i686 libc0.1-pic libc0.1-prof libc0.1-udeb libc0.3 libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-dev libc0.3-p

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 package glibc glibc-doc libc0.1 libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dev-i386 libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-i686 libc0.1-pic libc0.1-prof libc0.1-udeb libc0.3 libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-dev libc0.3-pic

Bug#421037: libc6: SIGILL on upgrade on netwinder

This one time, at band camp, Aurelien Jarno said: | Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.6.ds1-11 (using .../archives/libc6_2.5-4_arm.deb) ... | Unpacking replacement libc6 ... | dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.5-4_arm.deb (--unpack): | dpkg: warning - old

Bug#324900: nscd: umount /var fails (unclean shutdowns)

On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:35:04PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: I have the same problem but as it concerns a file that will be deleted anyway, it's not critical, and there is nothing that we can do (except code rc not to use bash I guess). It may be useful to have some way (like an

Bug#420604: nscd: coredumps (ldap related?)

Hello, I see something similar on a number of identical amd64 machines with nscd and nss-ldap, which have been running etch for a couple of days - on the affected machines, nscd dies with a SIGABORT within seconds from starting. What is interesting here is that behaviour seems to spread: at

Re: r2133 - glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in

Along similar lines, perhaps the preinst should check for it? If the preinst can see it in the envoronment, you know the system is screwed. :-) -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: severity of 420949 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.3 # not an RC issue with the upgrade, mostly a broken system severity 420949 important Bug#420949: New upgrade of libc6 2.5.* renders shells unusable Severity set to `important' from

Bug#420949: New upgrade of libc6 2.5.* renders shells unusable

David Baron a écrit : LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.6.1 /lib/ld-2.5.so /lib/libc.so.6 I have a LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19 in /etc/profile which was put there for jackd. Maybe I should get rid of that! Tried that with the upgrade and actually got into a bash login from the console but kdm would not

Bug#420949: marked as done (New upgrade of libc6 2.5.* renders shells unusable)

Your message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:14:17 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#420949: New upgrade of libc6 2.5.* renders shells unusable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#421173: nscd: depends on removed libssp0 package

Package: nscd Version: 2.5-4 Severity: grave Your package depends on libssp0 which is no longer present in the latest gcc-4.1 upload (4.1.2-4). Following Matthias Klose's advice in http://bugs.debian.org/421162, I report this as a bug against your package. Please examine whether a binNMU

Bug#421173: nscd: depends on removed libssp0 package

forcemerge 421173 413370 thanks On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:34:11PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: Package: nscd Version: 2.5-4 Severity: grave Your package depends on libssp0 which is no longer present in the latest gcc-4.1 upload (4.1.2-4). Following Matthias Klose's advice in

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#421173: nscd: depends on removed libssp0 package

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:27:56AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. reassign 421173 glibc Bug#421173: nscd: depends on removed libssp0 package Bug reassigned from package `nscd' to `glibc'. reassign

Bug#421173: nscd: depends on removed libssp0 package

On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:27:56AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: reassign 421173 glibc reassign 413370 glibc forcemerge 421173 413370 thanks # gee ... On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:34:11PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: Package: nscd Version: 2.5-4 Severity: grave Your package depends on

Bug#420726: libc6: ldconfig does not access /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*

Aurelien Jarno a écrit : Russell Coker a écrit : On Tuesday 24 April 2007 21:55, Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the content of /etc/ld.so.conf? This file should have a line containing: include /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf Empty. It is empty on all my machines which have been

r2139 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . control.in

Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-27 04:16:02 + (Fri, 27 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2139 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/control glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main Log: * debian/control.in/main: build depends on binutils (= 2.17.50).

Bug#421037: libc6: SIGILL on upgrade on netwinder

James Troup a écrit : Package: libc6 Version: 2.5-4 Severity: serious | Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.6.ds1-11 (using .../archives/libc6_2.5-4_arm.deb) ... | Unpacking replacement libc6 ... | dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.5-4_arm.deb (--unpack): | dpkg: