Re: Nice to see you.

2007-04-27 Thread Horsley Terence
If you will get porno by your pennis with mistress? Visit www.2211122. And add COM after dot at the end. Mica ce l'ho con voi", e quando siamo arrivati in un posto tranquillo abbiamo fatto. Prima Lupo e Vota Lanzidelli - DCmancanza del sesso. I nervi e le vene spiccavano in rilievo sulla pa

Processed: setting package to glibc glibc-doc libc0.1 libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dev-i386 libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-i686 libc0.1-pic libc0.1-prof libc0.1-udeb libc0.3 libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-dev libc0.3-p

2007-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > package glibc glibc-doc libc0.1 libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dev-i386 > libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-i686 libc0.1-pic libc0.1-prof libc0.1-udeb libc0.3 > libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-dev libc0.3-

Processed: [bts-link] source package glibc

2007-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package glibc > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report for

r2144 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/any

2007-04-27 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Author: madcoder Date: 2007-04-27 22:54:32 + (Fri, 27 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2144 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/cvs-scanf_hexfloat.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series Log: patches/any/cvs-scanf_hexfloat.diff: C

Bug#421277: marked as done (libc6: upgrade from 2.5-2 to 2.5-4 fails)

2007-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:43:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421277: libc6: upgrade from 2.5-2 to 2.5-4 fails has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#421277: libc6: upgrade from 2.5-2 to 2.5-4 fails

2007-04-27 Thread Christoph Franzen
Am 27 Apr 2007 um 16:51 schrieb Aurelien Jarno: Bonjour Aurelien, > Could you please give us the output of: > > ls -l /lib/tls voilà: christoph9:~# ls -l /lib/tls/ insgesamt 1940 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 88904 2004-12-27 03:41 ld-2.3.2.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2006-04-30 20:56 ld-linux

Bug#421037: libc6: SIGILL on upgrade on netwinder

2007-04-27 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Aurelien Jarno a écrit : > James Troup a écrit : >> Package: libc6 >> Version: 2.5-4 >> Severity: serious >> >> | Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.6.ds1-11 (using >> .../archives/libc6_2.5-4_arm.deb) ... >> | Unpacking replacement libc6 ... >> | dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2

Bug#421280: tzdata: post-installation script returned error exit status 10

2007-04-27 Thread Thibaut VARENE
Package: tzdata Version: 2007e-6 Severity: important I'm running a couple autobuilders, and since the latest upgrade of tzdata, none of them will work properly because of the following: Fetched 797kB in 3s (252kB/s) Setting up tzdata (2007e-6) ... dpkg: error processing tzdata (--configure): sub

Bug#421277: libc6: upgrade from 2.5-2 to 2.5-4 fails

2007-04-27 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Christoph Franzen a écrit : > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.5-2 > Severity: normal > > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: lenny/sid > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (630, 'stable'), (560, 'unstable'), (500, > 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'

Bug#421277: libc6: upgrade from 2.5-2 to 2.5-4 fails

2007-04-27 Thread Christoph Franzen
Package: libc6 Version: 2.5-2 Severity: normal -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (630, 'stable'), (560, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (490, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686)

Re: ``No symbol table info available.''

2007-04-27 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:05:04PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:06:57PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > $ sudo gdb /hurd/password 328 > > GNU gdb 6.5-debian > > [...] > > (gdb) bt full > > #0 0x011408f0 in _nss_files_parse_grent () from /lib/libc.so.0.3 > > No

r2143 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . control.in

2007-04-27 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-27 13:59:16 + (Fri, 27 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2143 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/control glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main Log: Drop build-conflicts on gcc-4.1 (= 4.1.1-14). Modified: glibc-package/t

r2142 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . control.in

2007-04-27 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-27 12:17:33 + (Fri, 27 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2142 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/control glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main Log: Fix the build depends line wrt gcc-4.1 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/control ==

Re: ``No symbol table info available.'' (was: glibc 2.5 on GNU/Hurd with GCC 4.1: `EXC_BAD_ACCESS' in glibc nss code)

2007-04-27 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:06:57PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > $ sudo gdb /hurd/password 328 > GNU gdb 6.5-debian > [...] > (gdb) bt full > #0 0x011408f0 in _nss_files_parse_grent () from /lib/libc.so.0.3 > No symbol table info available. > [...] > #v- > > Why is ``no symbol table info availa

r2141 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . control.in sysdeps

2007-04-27 Thread Clint Adams
Author: schizo Date: 2007-04-27 11:40:40 + (Fri, 27 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2141 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/FAQ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/control glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/depflag

``No symbol table info available.'' (was: glibc 2.5 on GNU/Hurd with GCC 4.1: `EXC_BAD_ACCESS' in glibc nss code)

2007-04-27 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:04:35PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > I built Debian glibc 2.5-4 on GNU/Hurd using GCC 4.1 instead of 4.0, > having applied a few patches I crafted already some time ago. #v+ $ sudo gdb /hurd/password 328 GNU gdb 6.5-debian [...] Attaching to program `/hurd/pas

glibc 2.5 on GNU/Hurd with GCC 4.1: `EXC_BAD_ACCESS' in glibc nss code

2007-04-27 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! I built Debian glibc 2.5-4 on GNU/Hurd using GCC 4.1 instead of 4.0, having applied a few patches I crafted already some time ago. It basically works. :-) However, if I try to log in on the console (`ssh'ing in works just fine) it fails with ``login: Authentication failure: (ipc/mig) ser

Bug#420552: ARM: apt-get source: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:68: make_request: Assertion...

2007-04-27 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-27 11:56]: > I don't see this on EABI, so I suspect that it is an old-ABI > alignment/padding issue in glibc. Yeah, it actually got fixed in -4. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Bug#420552: ARM: apt-get source: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:68: make_request: Assertion...

2007-04-27 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:37:22AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > After upgrading my ARM sid chroot to current sid, I get the following > when running apt-get source. Is this a bug in apt or libc6? > > (sid)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src$ apt-get source texlive-bin > Reading package lists... Done > B

r2140 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . control.in

2007-04-27 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-04-27 07:09:57 + (Fri, 27 Apr 2007) New Revision: 2140 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/control glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main Log: Fix the binutils version to match unstable one Modified: glibc-package/

Bug#409288: marked as done (nscd: does not start because of missing libssp.so.0)

2007-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:04:20 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line nscd: not installable in sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo