Bug#425134: [l10n] Updated Czech translation of tzdata debconf messages

Package: tzdata Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch Hi, in attachement there is updated Czech (cs.po) translation of tzdata debconf messages. Please include it with the package. Thanks -- Miroslav Kure # THIS FILE IS AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED FROM THE MASTER FILE # packages/po/cs.po # # DO NOT

r2228 - in tzdata/trunk/debian: . po

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-19 15:51:30 + (Sat, 19 May 2007) New Revision: 2228 Added: tzdata/trunk/debian/po/cs.po Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog Log: * New Czech debconf translation by Miroslav Kure. closes: #425134. Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog

r2229 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian: . debhelper.in

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-19 16:13:19 + (Sat, 19 May 2007) New Revision: 2229 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/debhelper.in/libc.install Log: * debian/debhelper.in/libc.install: do not hardcode the glibc version

Re: glibc 2.6 patch status

On 5/18/07, Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I took a brief look, and concluded that the following modifications will allow all the patches to apply. The lines that have been commented out represent patches that need to be reviewed and either fixed or thrown out. This is based on the 2.6

Re: glibc 2.6 patch status

I am available for discussing these patches. Some may already be upstream. For example I've committed the r19use patch to ports already, and some of the nptl changes have been committed already. Where is the debian-glibc svn? svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-glibc/ I'll commit what I've got to

Re: glibc 2.6 patch status

On 5/19/07, Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am available for discussing these patches. Some may already be upstream. For example I've committed the r19use patch to ports already, and some of the nptl changes have been committed already. Where is the debian-glibc svn?

Incompatibilities in upgrading to libc6 2.5

Hi, I'm running a Debian system with glibc6 2.3, but I'm stuck (i.e. I'm unable to install TeX and friends) unless I upgrade to glibc 2.5. This would be no problem if I didn't have to run commercial software (including a cross compiling toolchain) that was dinamically linked to glibc 2.3. I

Re: glibc 2.6 patch status

On 5/19/07, Carlos O'Donell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is your eta for having this cleaned up? Better put, when would you like these patches cleaned up? Cheers, Carlos. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Incompatibilities in upgrading to libc6 2.5

On 5/19/07, John Zoidberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running a Debian system with glibc6 2.3, but I'm stuck (i.e. I'm unable to install TeX and friends) unless I upgrade to glibc 2.5. This would be no problem if I didn't have to run commercial software (including a cross compiling toolchain)

r2230 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . debhelper.in

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-19 18:09:22 + (Sat, 19 May 2007) New Revision: 2230 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/libc.install Log: * debian/debhelper.in/libc.install: do not hardcode the glibc version number in the path to

Re: glibc 2.6 patch status

Better put, when would you like these patches cleaned up? I'm just in a hurry to get the packaging tweaked so that I can build and upload 2.6 to experimental, whether or not we have regressions from 2.5. Then we can see how it builds and works everywhere, get the outstanding patches re-evaluated

Re: glibc 2.6 patch status

On 5/19/07, Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Better put, when would you like these patches cleaned up? I'm just in a hurry to get the packaging tweaked so that I can build and upload 2.6 to experimental, whether or not we have regressions from 2.5. Then we can see how it builds and works

Bug#424057: libc6: internal error: symidx out of range of fptr table

On 5/15/07, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Today I saw this error for the second time on my hppa box running the 2.6.18-parisc64-smp kernel: cat: error while loading shared libraries: internal error: symidx out of range of fptr table This does not appear to be a reproducable error. The

r2232 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian: . patches

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-19 20:27:14 + (Sat, 19 May 2007) New Revision: 2232 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/patches/series Log: this patch is fine as long as the linuxthreads tarball is not rolled incorrectly

r2233 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . control.in sysdeps

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-19 20:46:06 + (Sat, 19 May 2007) New Revision: 2233 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/control glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl Log: *

r2234 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian: . control.in sysdeps

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-19 20:49:24 + (Sat, 19 May 2007) New Revision: 2234 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/control glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/control.in/main

r2235 - glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-19 20:58:33 + (Sat, 19 May 2007) New Revision: 2235 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/shlibver Log: * Bump shlibdeps version to 2.6-1 due to sync_file_range, futimens, utimensat,

r2236 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . sysdeps

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-19 21:09:24 + (Sat, 19 May 2007) New Revision: 2236 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl Log: retain Depends alternative on linux-kernel-headers for now, to avoid being blocked for testing Modified:

Re: Incompatibilities in upgrading to libc6 2.5

On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 06:47:00PM +0100, John Zoidberg wrote: So, does all the software linked to 2.3 also works with 2.5? yes and no. Yes everything *cleanly* linked against 2.3 should work with 2.5. *though* LD_ASSUME_KERNEL won't work with a version smaller than 2.6.1 and libc 2.5. So if

Re: glibc 2.6 patch status

On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 03:46:23PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: On 5/19/07, Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Better put, when would you like these patches cleaned up? I'm just in a hurry to get the packaging tweaked so that I can build and upload 2.6 to experimental, whether or not we

r2237 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian: . patches

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-19 23:16:10 + (Sat, 19 May 2007) New Revision: 2237 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/patches/series Log: re-enable more patches that apply successfully given a properly-rolled linuxthreads

r2238 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian: . patches patches/localedata

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-19 23:46:48 + (Sat, 19 May 2007) New Revision: 2238 Removed: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/patches/localedata/locales-sr.diff Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/patches/series Log:

r2239 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian: . patches patches/any

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-19 23:48:26 + (Sat, 19 May 2007) New Revision: 2239 Removed: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/patches/any/cvs-scanf_hexfloat.diff Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/patches/series

r2241 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian: . patches patches/any

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-20 00:17:11 + (Sun, 20 May 2007) New Revision: 2241 Removed: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/patches/any/cvs-zdump-64-bit.diff Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/patches/series Log:

r2242 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian: . patches patches/any

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-20 00:25:44 + (Sun, 20 May 2007) New Revision: 2242 Removed: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/patches/any/cvs-lt-update.diff Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/patches/series Log:

r2243 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian: . patches patches/any

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-20 00:30:35 + (Sun, 20 May 2007) New Revision: 2243 Removed: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/patches/any/cvs-itoa-c.diff Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/patches/series Log: -

r2245 - in tzdata/trunk/debian: . po

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-20 01:10:51 + (Sun, 20 May 2007) New Revision: 2245 Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog tzdata/trunk/debian/po/en.po Log: * Fix misspelling of Cambridge Bay in en.po. Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog

Processing of tzdata_2007f-3_all.changes

tzdata_2007f-3_all.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tzdata_2007f-3.dsc tzdata_2007f-3.diff.gz tzdata_2007f-3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

r2246 - in tzdata/trunk/debian: . po

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-20 01:20:50 + (Sun, 20 May 2007) New Revision: 2246 Added: tzdata/trunk/debian/po/eu.po Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog Log: * New Basque debconf translation by Piarres Beobide. closes: #424983. Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog

r2247 - in tzdata/trunk/debian: . po

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-20 01:20:52 + (Sun, 20 May 2007) New Revision: 2247 Added: tzdata/trunk/debian/po/sq.po Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog Log: * New Albanian debconf translation by Elian Myftiu. closes: #425172. Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog

r2248 - in tzdata/trunk/debian: . po

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-20 01:20:54 + (Sun, 20 May 2007) New Revision: 2248 Added: tzdata/trunk/debian/po/be.po Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog Log: * New Belarusian debconf translation by Paul Petruk. closes: #425134. Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog

r2249 - in tzdata/trunk/debian: . po

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-20 01:25:17 + (Sun, 20 May 2007) New Revision: 2249 Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog tzdata/trunk/debian/po/fr.po Log: * debian/po/fr.po: fixes from Christian Perrier. closes: #424437. Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog

tzdata_2007f-3_all.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: tzdata_2007f-3.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tzdata/tzdata_2007f-3.diff.gz tzdata_2007f-3.dsc to pool/main/t/tzdata/tzdata_2007f-3.dsc tzdata_2007f-3_all.deb to pool/main/t/tzdata/tzdata_2007f-3_all.deb Override entries for your package: tzdata_2007f-3.dsc - source libs

Bug#425134: marked as done ([l10n] Updated Czech translation of tzdata debconf messages)

Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 01:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#425134: fixed in tzdata 2007f-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#424437: marked as done (tzdata: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation)

Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 01:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#424437: fixed in tzdata 2007f-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#424983: marked as done (tzdata: [INTL:eu] debconf templates basque translation)

Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 01:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#424983: fixed in tzdata 2007f-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

r2250 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/hppa

Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-05-20 01:40:29 + (Sun, 20 May 2007) New Revision: 2250 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hppa/submitted-atomic_h.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series Log: *

r2251 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . control.in

Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-05-20 01:41:47 + (Sun, 20 May 2007) New Revision: 2251 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/control glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main Log: * debian/control.in/main: unify the gcc-4.1 depends to (= 4.1.2-6).

Processed: tagging 424681

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 tags 424681 - l10n Bug#424681: tzdata: /etc/localtime installed with insufficient permissions Tags were: l10n Tags removed: l10n End of message, stopping processing here. Please

r2252 - glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hppa

Author: aurel32 Date: 2007-05-20 01:55:34 + (Sun, 20 May 2007) New Revision: 2252 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hppa/submitted-atomic_h.diff Log: Reverse hppa/submitted-atomic_h.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hppa/submitted-atomic_h.diff

Processed: notfound 424681 in 2007f-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 notfound 424681 2007f-1 Bug#424681: tzdata: /etc/localtime installed with insufficient permissions Bug marked as not found in version 2007f-1. End of message, stopping processing

Processing of glibc_2.6~20070518-1_amd64.changes

glibc_2.6~20070518-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libc6-pic_2.6~20070518-1_amd64.deb glibc_2.6~20070518-1.diff.gz glibc_2.6~20070518-1.dsc glibc_2.6~20070518.orig.tar.gz libc6-udeb_2.6~20070518-1_amd64.udeb glibc-doc_2.6~20070518-1_all.deb

glibc_2.6~20070518-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: glibc-doc_2.6~20070518-1_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.6~20070518-1_all.deb glibc_2.6~20070518-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.6~20070518-1.diff.gz glibc_2.6~20070518-1.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.6~20070518-1.dsc glibc_2.6~20070518.orig.tar.gz to

glibc override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libc6-i386_2.6~20070518-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says standard. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is

Bug#423870: marked as done (libc6: /etc/init.d/glibc.sh - typo: depreciated - deprecated)

Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 02:32:05 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#423870: fixed in glibc 2.6~20070518-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#422625: marked as done (libc6 2.5-5 breaks binutils 2.17-3)

Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 02:32:05 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#422625: fixed in glibc 2.6~20070518-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

r2253 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian: . rules.d

Author: schizo Date: 2007-05-20 02:25:00 + (Sun, 20 May 2007) New Revision: 2253 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/rules.d/build.mk Log: * debian/rules.d/build.mk: pass --enable-profile to configure. Modified: