Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#438179: fixed in glibc 2.6.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#438114: fixed in glibc 2.6.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#435640: fixed in glibc 2.6.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#437404: fixed in glibc 2.6.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#438576: fixed in glibc 2.6.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#435646: fixed in glibc 2.6.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-09-03 16:20:57 + (Mon, 03 Sep 2007)
New Revision: 2530
Added:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/local-ipv6-lookup.diff
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series
Log:
* any/local-ipv6-lookup.diff: new patc
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-09-03 16:04:19 + (Mon, 03 Sep 2007)
New Revision: 2529
Added:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/sk.po
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* New Slovak debconf translation, by Ivan Mas?\195?\161r. Closes: bug#438576.
Modified: glibc-package/tru
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-09-03 16:00:37 + (Mon, 03 Sep 2007)
New Revision: 2528
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Add missing changelog entry
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- glibc-pa
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-09-03 15:59:11 + (Mon, 03 Sep 2007)
New Revision: 2527
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/rules.d/build.mk
Log:
Build fix
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/rules.d/build.mk
===
--- glibc-packag
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-09-03 15:58:58 + (Mon, 03 Sep 2007)
New Revision: 2526
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/shlibver
Log:
* Bump shlibdeps version to 2.6.1-1 due to SPARC v9 transition.
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-03 15:42]:
> When I replace libdl.so.2, ld.so.1 and libc.so.6 in the initrd with a
> version from May, the initrd will start correctly. (I will get
> "relocation error: version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6"
> messages later on, obviously,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 05:00:08PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> When I use mklibs-copy rather than mklibs to produce the initrd it
> works. Maybe waldi can give some help as to how to track this down.
The symbol-version-problem #433874. Currently only binNMUs can
workaround it.
Bastian
--
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-02 20:09]:
> Now, the daily image didn't work on a Cobalt (nothing happens after
> "Freeing unused kernel memory") but I believe that's a different
> problem.
When I replace libdl.so.2, ld.so.1 and libc.so.6 in the initrd with a
version from May, the
14 matches
Mail list logo
