On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 03:03:51AM +, peter green wrote:
> This would seem to indicate that libc6-i686 was previously installed and
> being updated normally but at some point during or after the update to
> 2.6.1-1 it's entry in the dpkg status file completely dissapeared.
Perhaps leaving /v
+++-==-==-
un libc6-i686 (no description available)
The file comes from libc6-i686 version 2.6.1-1. According to the symlink
it has been installed on 2007-08-21 (ie the date it migrates to
testing).
After a bit o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 454266 normal
Bug#454266: upgrade to 2.7 fails, leaving system unusable
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
severity 454266 normal
quit
Downgrading this until it can be reproduced.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package glibc
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #453408
# * http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5441
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags
Package: tzdata
Version: 2007j-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please find the updated German debconf translation for tzdata
attached.
Please place this file in debian/po/ as de.po for your next upload.
If you update your template, please use
'msgfmt --statistics '
to check the po-files f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #woops that was a mistake
> reopen 454266
Bug#454266: upgrade to 2.7 fails, leaving system unusable
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Marcus Better a écrit :
>> this looks rotten, on a machine I have access to (an i386):
>
> Seems the file is from version 2.6.1:
>
> ~$ md5sum /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
> 76e00ba611b3bcb7827bd3f4e3b4930f /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
> ~$ ls -l /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 20
Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:57:11 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#454266: upgrade to 2.7 fails, leaving system unusable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Marcus Better a écrit :
> Should these files really be on my system if I don't have libc6-i686?
>
> ~$ ls /lib/i686/cmov/
> ld-2.6.1.so libmemusage.so libnss_nis.so.2@
> ld-linux.so.2@libm.so.6@ libpcprofile.so
> libanl-2.6.1.so libnsl-2.
Should these files really be on my system if I don't have libc6-i686?
~$ ls /lib/i686/cmov/
ld-2.6.1.so libmemusage.so libnss_nis.so.2@
ld-linux.so.2@libm.so.6@ libpcprofile.so
libanl-2.6.1.so libnsl-2.6.1.so libpthread-2.6.1.so
> this looks rotten, on a machine I have access to (an i386):
Seems the file is from version 2.6.1:
~$ md5sum /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
76e00ba611b3bcb7827bd3f4e3b4930f /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
~$ ls -l /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2007-08-21 13:05 /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
> are you using pax execshield or anything like that ?
No, not on this machine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 02:53:05PM +, Marcus Better wrote:
> > Could you provide an md5sum (or any non too trivial checksum) of
> > /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 ?
>
> 76e00ba611b3bcb7827bd3f4e3b4930f /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
this looks rotten, on a machine I have access to (an i386):
$ dpkg
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:57:14PM +, Marcus Better wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Could you touch /etc/ld.so.nohwcap and see if it looks like that fixes
> >your system ?
>
> Yes, that fixes it!
okay so there is an issue with the optimized version of the library.
touching /etc/ld.so.n
> Could you provide an md5sum (or any non too trivial checksum) of
> /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 ?
76e00ba611b3bcb7827bd3f4e3b4930f /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El 03/12/07 10:34, Aurelien Jarno escribió:
>> The Venezuelan timezone change will happen on Dec 9, at 0300 UTC-0400,
>> patches have been posted to [1], and will hopefully be released on
>> tzdata2007j.
...
> I don't really understand. The timezone
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Could you touch /etc/ld.so.nohwcap and see if it looks like that fixes
your system ?
Yes, that fixes it!
Attempting the upgrade again makes the problem re-appear, and the
upgrade fails with the following messages:
Setting up libc6 (2.7-3) ...
dpkg[3484]: segfault at
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
That looks ok. Which kernel are you using?
2.6.24-rc3 when it broke, but using 2.6.23 didn't help. Both are
self-compiled.
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcus Better a écrit :
> retitle 454266 upgrade to 2.7 fails, leaving system unusable
> notfound 454266 2.7-2
> thanks
>
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> This is clearly a differentl problem than the one that has been
>> reported.
>
> Ok, cloning accordingly.
>
>> What is the state of your system?
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 454266 !
Bug#454266: upgrade to 2.7 fails, leaving system unusable
Changed Bug submitter from Emil Nowak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Marcus Better
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 454266 upgrade to 2.7 fails, leaving system unusable
Bug#454266: "upgrade to 2.7 fails, leaving system unusable"
Changed Bug title to `upgrade to 2.7 fails, leaving system unusable' from
`"upgrade to 2.7 fails, leaving system unusable"'.
> not
retitle 454266 upgrade to 2.7 fails, leaving system unusable
notfound 454266 2.7-2
thanks
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
This is clearly a differentl problem than the one that has been
reported.
Ok, cloning accordingly.
What is the state of your system?
Serious but stable :-)
If you still have a s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 453480 -1
Bug#453480: postinst - Segmentation fault
Bug 453480 cloned as bug 454266.
> severity 453480 important
Bug#453480: postinst - Segmentation fault
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> notfound 453480 2.7-3
Bug#453480: postinst - Se
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 92186 -1
Bug#92186: libc6: getpwnam(3) should distinguish between NIS errors and user
not found
Bug 92186 cloned as bug 454262.
> reopen -1
Bug#454262: libc6: getpwnam(3) should distinguish between NIS errors and user
not found
Bug reopened, or
Marcus Better a écrit :
> severity 453480 grave
> found 453480 2.7-3
> thanks
>
> I just hit this problem (or maybe a similar one) when upgrading from
> 2.6.1-1+b1 - unfortunately in my case it rendered the system unusable.
> Any command now segfaults:
>
> ~# cat
> cat[1240]: segfault at 00
Oh, and I'm not using a graphical frontend, but the dialog-based (the
one with text-mode menus with block graphics). So maybe it's a different
problem - leaving for maintainers to decide.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 453480 grave
Bug#453480: postinst - Segmentation fault
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> found 453480 2.7-3
Bug#453480: postinst - Segmentation fault
Bug marked as found in version 2.7-3.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
severity 453480 grave
found 453480 2.7-3
thanks
I just hit this problem (or maybe a similar one) when upgrading from
2.6.1-1+b1 - unfortunately in my case it rendered the system unusable.
Any command now segfaults:
~# cat
cat[1240]: segfault at eip esp bfac0dac error 4
Some
On Monday 03 December 2007, you wrote:
> Marc Donner a écrit :
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.5-7
> > Severity: important
> >
> > the syslog() funktion seems sometimes to end in a deadlock, if a
> > multithreaded process, where are threads logging to syslog, at the
> > same time does a fork() an
reassign 351469 valgrind
thanks
those are because the libc often uses things like:
struct {
char c;
int i;
};
then performs an action based on if (x->c) which in the CPU loads the
full integer "around" c with its padding, and if the struct hasn't been
fully memset'ed (including p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 351469 valgrind
Bug#351469: libc6: valgrind errs in getaddrinfo
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `valgrind'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-3
Followup-For: Bug #351469
Hello,
I'm not sure if this should be a bug for itself or only a followup for
#351469. I choosed the latter hoping for being less annoying :-)
Using valgrind 3.2.3-3, I have:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ cat test.c
int main(in
33 matches
Mail list logo
