Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.7-6
Severity: important
Hi,
I've adopted a package, libx86, which is failing the build on some
architectures [1]. Reading the build logs [2], I've noted that the error is:
error: sys/io.h: No such file or directory
Looking in
http://packages.debian.org/sid//libc6-d
Your message dated Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:01:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#465721: libc6-dev: /usr/include/sys/io.h missing from
some architectures
has caused the Debian Bug report #465721,
regarding libc6-dev: /usr/include/sys/io.h missing from some architect
Il giorno Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:01:30 +0100
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> > Is this intended? How should we port the applications to these
> > architectures?
>
> Yes it is intended. Those architectures do not have I/O ports, that's
> why this file is not present.
Thank you for t
David Paleino a écrit :
> Il giorno Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:01:30 +0100
> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
>>> Is this intended? How should we port the applications to these
>>> architectures?
>> Yes it is intended. Those architectures do not have I/O ports, that's
>> why this file is
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:21:46PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As many people know, som header change in libc6-dev made libqt3-mt (and maybe
> other packages) drop some symbols on one or more archs.
>
> For full details, see the thread starting here:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-dev
Il giorno Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:09:49 +0100
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> David Paleino a écrit :
>
> > Thank you for the quick reply. Is there any easy way to port applications
> > using io.h to these architectures? (/me types google.com in the meanwhile)
>
> Why those applicati
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:47:00AM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:21:46PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > As many people know, som header change in libc6-dev made libqt3-mt (and
> > maybe
> > other packages) drop some symbols on one or more archs.
> >
> >
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-8
Severity: important
I've a base.tgz for faster chroot setup within FAI (so it's like a
normal bootstrapped system in case you aren't familiar with FAI) and
upgrading from 2.3.6.ds1-13etch2 to libc6 2.7-8 fails:
, [ quoting upgrade process ]
| [...]
| Non-interac
Michael Prokop a écrit :
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.7-8
> Severity: important
>
>
> I've a base.tgz for faster chroot setup within FAI (so it's like a
> normal bootstrapped system in case you aren't familiar with FAI) and
> upgrading from 2.3.6.ds1-13etch2 to libc6 2.7-8 fails:
>
> , [ qu
* Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080214 17:28]:
> Michael Prokop a écrit :
> > I've a base.tgz for faster chroot setup within FAI (so it's like a
> > normal bootstrapped system in case you aren't familiar with FAI) and
> > upgrading f
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13etch4
GNU libc seems to get some of the odder reaches of the C99 strtod()
spec wrong. Observe:
mnementh$ cat strtod-test.c
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
double d;
char *endp;
char *s = argv[1];
if (argc != 2)
{
printf("Usag
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-6
Severity: normal
Since one of the last updates I noticed my system stoppend using ipv6.
I seam to have tracked that problem down to the new RFC3484 and
/etc/gai.conf functionality...
Actual situation, local machine:
eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:13:ce:36
Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:20:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#465797: libc6: RFC 3484 ipv6 address selection order
does not work as expected
has caused the Debian Bug report #465797,
regarding libc6: RFC 3484 ipv6 address selection order does not
Salut Aurelien
> This has been fixed in version 2.7-7. Closing the bug.
Thank you for your quick reply. I belive it's not fixed.
After updating and rebooting the new machine to make sure the new libc6 ist
being used for sure:
ii libc6 2.7-8 GNU C Librar
14 matches
Mail list logo
