Re: Proposal(s) for handling libqt3-mt situation

2008-02-16 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 01:22:31PM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > We should still look in the archive if other libraries have the > symbols and deal on a per case basis. It seems c++ libraries are the one > affected, C ones usually arent as extern inline has a different meaning > in C (especiall

Re: Proposal(s) for handling libqt3-mt situation

2008-02-16 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:58:13AM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > I absolutely don't understand how that can be true. I mean it doesn't > make sense, ktorrent gets the symbol from the libc6, and it just emits > an undefined symbol because qt3 provides it at the time, there is no way > it gets it

Bug#460226: marked as done (Memory leak in SUNRPC code)

2008-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:17:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#460226: fixed in glibc 2.3.6.ds1-13etch5 has caused the Debian Bug report #460226, regarding Memory leak in SUNRPC code to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

glibc_2.3.6.ds1-13etch5_i386.changes INSTALLED into stable

2008-02-16 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: glibc-doc_2.3.6.ds1-13etch5_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.6.ds1-13etch5_all.deb glibc_2.3.6.ds1-13etch5.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.6.ds1-13etch5.diff.gz glibc_2.3.6.ds1-13etch5.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.6.ds1-13etch5.dsc libc6-amd64_2.3.6.ds1-13e

Re: Proposal(s) for handling libqt3-mt situation

2008-02-16 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hi, 2008 m. February 16 d., Saturday, Pierre Habouzit rašė: > Okay that's quite a few, so the "Conflict" option sucks. Here is > another plan, tell me what you think, we put a debian specific hack in > the glibc to reenable the extern inlines for _ONLY_ the packages that > ask for it, for lenny,

Re: Proposal(s) for handling libqt3-mt situation

2008-02-16 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:52:01AM +, Modestas Vainius wrote: > Hi, > > 2008 m. February 16 d., Saturday, Pierre Habouzit rašė: > > Okay that's quite a few, so the "Conflict" option sucks. Here is > > another plan, tell me what you think, we put a debian specific hack in > > the glibc to ree

Processed: forcibly merging 465844 466026

2008-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13 > forcemerge 465844 466026 Bug#465844: libc6: Can't upgrade from Etch Bug#466026: libc6: doesn't upgrade from etch Bug#465753: libc6: symbol _dl_out_of_memory, version GLIBC_PRIVATE no

Re: Proposal(s) for handling libqt3-mt situation

2008-02-16 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 08:08:17AM +, Matthew Rosewarne wrote: > On Thursday 14 February 2008, Modestas Vainius wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As of writing, libqt3-mt ABI breakage caused serious 16 bugs (#464946 & > > friends) to be reported by our users. So I think it's high time we took > > some act