Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 379938 libc6
Bug#379938: free() in dlerror() if library is not present
Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `libc6'.
> reassign 489066 libc6
Bug#489066: glibc: dlclose() from threaded program on linuxthreads
architectures (hppa, kfree
Your message dated Sun, 10 May 2009 19:19:00 +0200
with message-id <20090510171900.gt8...@hall.aurel32.net>
and subject line Re: eglibc: FTBFS: regression in tst-eintr1
has caused the Debian Bug report #527567,
regarding eglibc: FTBFS: regression in tst-eintr1
to be marked as done.
This means tha
On 2009-05-10 10:25 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 09:18:56AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> 2.6.28.10 does not show the problem (repeated the test a few dozen
>> times), but all 2.6.29 kernels I've tested have it, including Debian's
>> official 2.6.29-2-amd64 package.
Author: aurel32
Date: 2009-05-10 15:19:52 + (Sun, 10 May 2009)
New Revision: 3490
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/sysdeps/alpha.mk
Log:
- alpha has been moved to ports, update debian/sysdeps/alpha.mk
accord
Author: aurel32
Date: 2009-05-10 14:00:31 + (Sun, 10 May 2009)
New Revision: 3489
Removed:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/patches/hppa/cvs-nptl.diff
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/changelog
Log:
- Remove debian/patches/hppa/cvs-nptl.diff (merged).
M
--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2009-05-10 13:12
---
This bug has been solved in version 2.10, despite the WONTFIX tag.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4028
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are w
Author: aurel32
Date: 2009-05-10 13:14:09 + (Sun, 10 May 2009)
New Revision: 3487
Removed:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/patches/any/submitted-date-and-unknown-tz.diff
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/
Author: aurel32
Date: 2009-05-10 13:04:56 + (Sun, 10 May 2009)
New Revision: 3486
Removed:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/patches/localedata/submitted-bz9835-en_GB-first_day.diff
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2
Author: aurel32
Date: 2009-05-10 12:37:09 + (Sun, 10 May 2009)
New Revision: 3485
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/patches/localedata/sort-UTF8-first.diff
Log:
- Update debian/patches/localedata/sort-UTF8-first.d
Author: aurel32
Date: 2009-05-10 12:20:16 + (Sun, 10 May 2009)
New Revision: 3483
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/changelog
Log:
Wrap line in changelog
Modified: glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/changelog
===
Author: aurel32
Date: 2009-05-10 09:37:25 + (Sun, 10 May 2009)
New Revision: 3482
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/patches/any/local-dynamic-resolvconf.diff
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/patches/any/l
Author: aurel32
Date: 2009-05-10 09:07:53 + (Sun, 10 May 2009)
New Revision: 3481
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/patches/hurd-i386/local-tls-support.diff
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/patches/hurd-i
Author: aurel32
Date: 2009-05-10 08:35:06 + (Sun, 10 May 2009)
New Revision: 3480
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/debhelper.in/libc-alt.lintian
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.10/debian/debhelper.in/libc-otherbui
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 09:18:56AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2009-05-09 23:16 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > Are you able to reproduce the problem with previous versions? 2.9-10 is
> > still on the mirrors for example.
>
> Initially I had the problem with 2.9-9, but did not bother to re
On 2009-05-09 23:16 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Are you able to reproduce the problem with previous versions? 2.9-10 is
> still on the mirrors for example.
Initially I had the problem with 2.9-9, but did not bother to report it
as 2.9-10 built successfully. Retrying today, 2.9-10 also fails t
15 matches
Mail list logo
