Hi,
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:45:11AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
Aurelien,
The following patch is a lightly-tested (I built each test by hand and
verified they worked) update which implements the non-SHARED (static
linking) case.
Could you give the attached patch a try and tell me
Author: aurel32
Date: 2010-05-26 09:43:39 + (Wed, 26 May 2010)
New Revision: 4288
Added:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.11/debian/patches/hppa/local-dlfptr.diff
Removed:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.11/debian/patches/hppa/local-ELF_MACHINE_BEFORE_RTLD_RELOC.diff
Author: aurel32
Date: 2010-05-26 09:53:29 + (Wed, 26 May 2010)
New Revision: 4289
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.11/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.11/debian/testsuite-checking/expected-results-hppa-linux-gnu-libc
Log:
* Allow failures of the testsuite on
Author: aurel32
Date: 2010-05-26 10:11:48 + (Wed, 26 May 2010)
New Revision: 4290
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.11/debian/testsuite-checking/expected-results-sparc64-linux-gnu-sparc64
Log:
Update expected-results-sparc64-linux-gnu-sparc64
Modified:
Author: aurel32
Date: 2010-05-26 14:19:50 + (Wed, 26 May 2010)
New Revision: 4291
Added:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.11/debian/patches/sh4/cvs-register_dump.diff
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.11/debian/patches/series
Log:
* Add debian/patches/sh4/cvs-register_dump.diff
Author: aurel32
Date: 2010-05-26 14:34:34 + (Wed, 26 May 2010)
New Revision: 4292
Added:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.11/debian/patches/hurd-i386/submitted-regex_internal.diff
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.11/debian/changelog
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org wrote:
(1) tstdiomisc - Mark as expected fail until the compiler is fixed.
(2) tst-vfork1 - Kernel issue, mark this and tst-vfork2 as expected
fail until the kernel is fixed
(3) tststatic - Fixed by attached patch.
(4)
Author: aurel32
Date: 2010-05-26 18:28:45 + (Wed, 26 May 2010)
New Revision: 4293
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.11/debian/changelog
Log:
Increase version
Modified: glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.11/debian/changelog
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 03:10:49PM +0200, Iker Salmón San Millán wrote:
I am sorry, i am messing it up with the cont...@debian.list. I am starting
to underestand how works the bugs list.
i guess i have to send to you my emails (just in this case with this bug)
To me and
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:03:10PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 03:10:49PM +0200, Iker Salmón San Millán wrote:
I am sorry, i am messing it up with the cont...@debian.list. I am starting
to underestand how works the bugs list.
i guess i have to send to you my
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:10:25PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:03:10PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 03:10:49PM +0200, Iker Salmón San Millán wrote:
I am sorry, i am messing it up with the cont...@debian.list. I am
starting
to
El 26 de mayo de 2010 21:10, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net escribió:
Actually it may come from new dpkg features. Do you know which version
of dpkg was installed at the time of the problem?
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net
Filesystem ext4
thanks
El 26 de mayo de 2010 21:31, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net escribió:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:10:25PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:03:10PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 03:10:49PM +0200, Iker Salmón San
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:31:57PM +0200, Iker Salmón San Millán wrote:
El 26 de mayo de 2010 21:10, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net escribió:
Actually it may come from new dpkg features. Do you know which version
of dpkg was installed at the time of the problem?
--
Aurelien
eglibc_2.11.1-0exp9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
eglibc_2.11.1-0exp9.dsc
eglibc_2.11.1.orig.tar.gz
eglibc_2.11.1-0exp9.diff.gz
glibc-doc_2.11.1-0exp9_all.deb
eglibc-source_2.11.1-0exp9_all.deb
locales_2.11.1-0exp9_all.deb
eglibc_2.11.1-0exp9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
eglibc_2.11.1-0exp9.dsc
eglibc_2.11.1.orig.tar.gz
eglibc_2.11.1-0exp9.diff.gz
glibc-doc_2.11.1-0exp9_all.deb
eglibc-source_2.11.1-0exp9_all.deb
locales_2.11.1-0exp9_all.deb
¡÷ÄúºÃ!
8±¾ÎλéLÆÚ£I´ú¡ðÀíÈ«ø¸÷µØÆÕͨ(ø.µØ)¶//°l¡îƱ
È磨ÉÌÆ·äNÊÛ V¸æ ·þÕ ½¨ºB ß\Ý ÔöÖµ¶ º£êPÀU¿îø£©µÈ£¬
ücµÄ£¬½^¦Õ桿Ʊ£¬¿Éò×CáḶ¿î¡£gÓÓÐÒâÕßíë×ÉÔ£¡
ë Ô£º 13622326005
Q Q £º 454742004
ÐÕ Ãû£º
Ok, i've reroduced the bug, i've downgraded locales and upgraded again, and
I get the same errors, in this time, just generating locales with locale-gen
solved the problem (without rebooting)
I am using the kernel 2.6.32-4-686 wich was in sid, ( i've just noticed
there isn't any longer). I am
The same happens with kernel 2.6.32-5-686. I cannot acces now to the others
computers to see if i can reproduce the bug or maybe theres is something
diferent in my laptop's configuration.
It is not a problem because regenerating locales the problem disappear, but
i am so curious now...
Thanks
Warnings:
ignoring eglibc_2.11.1.orig.tar.gz, since it's already in the archive.
Accepted:
eglibc-source_2.11.1-0exp9_all.deb
to main/e/eglibc/eglibc-source_2.11.1-0exp9_all.deb
eglibc_2.11.1-0exp9.diff.gz
to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.11.1-0exp9.diff.gz
eglibc_2.11.1-0exp9.dsc
to
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libc6-i386_2.11.1-0exp9_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says standard.
locales-all_2.11.1-0exp9_amd64.deb: package says section is localization,
override says
Your message dated Wed, 26 May 2010 22:24:58 +
with message-id e1ohp22-0003ew...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#568924: fixed in eglibc 2.11.1-0exp9
has caused the Debian Bug report #568924,
regarding fallocate64() is missing in libc 2.10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 26 May 2010 22:24:58 +
with message-id e1ohp22-0003f2...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#569592: fixed in eglibc 2.11.1-0exp9
has caused the Debian Bug report #569592,
regarding please add RES_USE_DNSSEC support
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 26 May 2010 22:24:58 +
with message-id e1ohp22-0003f7...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#575404: fixed in eglibc 2.11.1-0exp9
has caused the Debian Bug report #575404,
regarding crontab fail to run /etc/init.d/nscd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 26 May 2010 22:24:58 +
with message-id e1ohp22-0003fe...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#582383: fixed in eglibc 2.11.1-0exp9
has caused the Debian Bug report #582383,
regarding libc6: When creating/removing a lot of interfaces it's possible to
trigger an abort in
25 matches
Mail list logo
