Default Debian/Ubuntu cross compiler did not had hardening support
enabled but this got changed in gcc-4.6 4.6.2-6 version. Due to this
eglibc is no longer cross buildable as "-fno-stack-protector
-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE" are set only for native builds.
This change sets those flags for both native
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:47:11AM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>
> Default Debian/Ubuntu cross compiler did not had hardening support
> enabled but this got changed in gcc-4.6 4.6.2-6 version. Due to this
> eglibc is no longer cross buildable as "-fno-stack-protector
> -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE" are
Author: aurel32
Date: 2011-12-19 12:06:03 + (Mon, 19 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 5097
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/armel.mk
glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/armhf.mk
Log:
* sysdeps/armel.mk, sysdeps/armhf.mk: fix cross compiling.
Package: eglibc
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Hello,
Attached is the updated Dutch translation of the eglibc debconf templates.
Please include it in your next upload.
Regards,
--
Jeroen Schot
# Dutch translation of eglibc po-debconf templates.
# Copyright (C) 2008-2011 THE PACKAGE'S COPYR
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 652632 + pending
Bug #652632 [eglibc] eglibc: [INTL:nl] Dutch translation of debconf templates
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
652632: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Author: aurel32
Date: 2011-12-19 13:27:45 + (Mon, 19 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 5098
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/nl.po
Log:
* Update Dutch debconf translation, by Jeroen Schot. Closes: #652632.
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/chang
Author: aurel32
Date: 2011-12-19 15:11:32 + (Mon, 19 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 5099
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hurd-i386/tg-struct_stat.diff
Log:
* patches/hurd/tg-struct_stat.diff: fix #ifdef typos.
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/
Author: aurel32
Date: 2011-12-19 17:38:40 + (Mon, 19 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 5101
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/cvs-tzfile.diff
Log:
Fix bugs in cvs-tzfile.diff
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/cvs-tzfile.diff
On arm linux sys/ucontext.h heavilly polloutes the global
namespace firstly by including sys/user.h (which defines
among other things a type called "struct user" and secondly
by defining symbols and #defines named R? to represent
the processor registers.
That issue in itself is nothing new but fa
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, peter green wrote:
> On the issue of the R? definitions I proposed renaming them
> to REG_R?. The use of a REG_ prefix is consistent with
> x86, x64 and sparc (I couldn't find any comparable definitions
> at all on other architectures I looked at) I asked what the
> impact of
Dixi quod…
>Jonathan Nieder dixit:
>
>>Thorsten, can you test this patch or arrange for it to be tested?
>
>Will do that
Built, WFM.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
a peeing section in a swimming pool.”
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 652356 + fixed-upstream
Bug #652356 [src:eglibc] please use argument-safe bswap macros on all
architectures
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
652356: http://bugs.de
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
The most obvious users of these definitions would be (native) GDB and
gdbserver - do those still build OK (i.e. include the correct headers to
get the definitions they need and not rely on any definitions that were
removed) after this patch?
I have built the debian gdb
13 matches
Mail list logo
